From: Erik Slagter <erik@slagter.name>
To: Borislav Petkov <petkov@uni-muenster.de>
Cc: Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org>,
"Brown, Len" <len.brown@intel.com>, Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>,
akpm@osdl.org, acpi-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [ACPI] Re: [PATCH] [2.6.13-mm2] set IBM ThinkPad extras to default n in Kconfig
Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2005 11:47:25 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1126345645.4766.40.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050910094259.GA16051@gollum.tnic>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1131 bytes --]
On Sat, 2005-09-10 at 11:42 +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 06:25:00PM +0200, Roman Zippel wrote:
>
> > The best would be to avoid using defaults completely, unless the resulting
> > kernel is non-functional (e.g. it doesn't compile or boot).
> > So far it's still the responsibility of the user to explicitly turn
> > everything on he needs (at least until we have a functional autoconfig).
> > BTW distros are not the only users, from them I would expect how to
> > configure a kernel.
>
> Actually, this sounds pretty sane and IMHO is somehow the biggest common
> denominator concerning linux users and their kernel configuration
> recreational activities :); but seriously, going all over the menus of Kbuild
> and turning everything off is a lot of work compared to turning on the
> several things I need on my system. "default m" is also not a good thing
> since compiling of unnecessary modules is simply dumb for a system
> that's just not going to use them.
Not to mention the bugs you get for free while you don't even (actively)
use the offending module/piece of code.
[-- Attachment #2: smime.p7s --]
[-- Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature, Size: 2115 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-09-10 9:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-09-09 16:06 [PATCH] [2.6.13-mm2] set IBM ThinkPad extras to default n in Kconfig Brown, Len
2005-09-09 16:25 ` Roman Zippel
2005-09-10 9:42 ` Borislav Petkov
2005-09-10 9:47 ` Erik Slagter [this message]
2005-09-10 10:20 ` Andi Kleen
2005-09-09 16:29 ` Andi Kleen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1126345645.4766.40.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=erik@slagter.name \
--cc=acpi-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=petkov@uni-muenster.de \
--cc=zippel@linux-m68k.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox