From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: 2.6.39-rc5-mmotm0429 - lockdep splat in fsck/acpi
Date: Tue, 03 May 2011 10:15:41 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <11287.1304432141@localhost> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 9307 bytes --]
No, I have no idea how a path invoked by fsck and a path invoked by acpi
managed to cross paths. Lot of scheduler and acpi function names in the
tracebacks, so, tossing it to everybody plausible in MAINTAINERS.
Saw this during boot this morning:
[ 87.294863] =======================================================
[ 87.295177] [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
[ 87.295402] 2.6.39-rc5-mmotm0429 #1
[ 87.295531] -------------------------------------------------------
[ 87.295727] fsck/3150 is trying to acquire lock:
[ 87.295727] (rcu_node_level_0){..-...}, at: [<ffffffff810904a8>] rcu_read_unlock_special+0x8c/0x1d5
[ 87.295727]
[ 87.295727] but task is already holding lock:
[ 87.295727] (&rq->lock){-.-.-.}, at: [<ffffffff81031dfb>] scheduler_ipi+0x34/0x5d
[ 87.295727]
[ 87.295727] which lock already depends on the new lock.
[ 87.295727]
[ 87.295727]
[ 87.295727] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
[ 87.295727]
[ 87.295727] -> #2 (&rq->lock){-.-.-.}:
[ 87.295727] [<ffffffff810670e1>] check_prevs_add+0x8b/0x104
[ 87.295727] [<ffffffff810674c9>] validate_chain+0x36f/0x3ab
[ 87.295727] [<ffffffff81067b93>] __lock_acquire+0x369/0x3e2
[ 87.295727] [<ffffffff81068137>] lock_acquire+0xfc/0x14c
[ 87.295727] [<ffffffff81567951>] _raw_spin_lock+0x36/0x45
[ 87.295727] [<ffffffff81027df9>] __task_rq_lock+0x8b/0xd3
[ 87.295727] [<ffffffff81032fd1>] wake_up_new_task+0x41/0x108
[ 87.295727] [<ffffffff81037714>] do_fork+0x265/0x33f
[ 87.295727] [<ffffffff81007d02>] kernel_thread+0x6b/0x6d
[ 87.295727] [<ffffffff81538bbd>] rest_init+0x21/0xd2
[ 87.295727] [<ffffffff81b20b4f>] start_kernel+0x3bb/0x3c6
[ 87.295727] [<ffffffff81b2029f>] x86_64_start_reservations+0xaf/0xb3
[ 87.295727] [<ffffffff81b20393>] x86_64_start_kernel+0xf0/0xf7
[ 87.295727]
[ 87.295727] -> #1 (&p->pi_lock){-.-.-.}:
[ 87.295727] [<ffffffff810670e1>] check_prevs_add+0x8b/0x104
[ 87.295727] [<ffffffff810674c9>] validate_chain+0x36f/0x3ab
[ 87.295727] [<ffffffff81067b93>] __lock_acquire+0x369/0x3e2
[ 87.295727] [<ffffffff81068137>] lock_acquire+0xfc/0x14c
[ 87.295727] [<ffffffff81567a4a>] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x44/0x57
[ 87.295727] [<ffffffff81032de1>] try_to_wake_up+0x29/0x1aa
[ 87.295727] [<ffffffff81032f8e>] wake_up_process+0x10/0x12
[ 87.295727] [<ffffffff8108ff01>] rcu_cpu_kthread_timer+0x44/0x58
[ 87.295727] [<ffffffff810452ce>] call_timer_fn+0xac/0x1e9
[ 87.295727] [<ffffffff810455b5>] run_timer_softirq+0x1aa/0x1f2
[ 87.295727] [<ffffffff8103e4cf>] __do_softirq+0x109/0x26a
[ 87.295727] [<ffffffff8156f5cc>] call_softirq+0x1c/0x30
[ 87.295727] [<ffffffff81003207>] do_softirq+0x44/0xf1
[ 87.295727] [<ffffffff8103e901>] irq_exit+0x58/0xc8
[ 87.295727] [<ffffffff81017f5a>] smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0x79/0x87
[ 87.295727] [<ffffffff8156f153>] apic_timer_interrupt+0x13/0x20
[ 87.295727] [<ffffffff81059935>] up+0x55/0x5d
[ 87.295727] [<ffffffff81251dcd>] acpi_os_signal_semaphore+0x1c/0x27
[ 87.295727] [<ffffffff8127459c>] acpi_ut_release_mutex+0x59/0x5d
[ 87.295727] [<ffffffff8126bbb9>] acpi_ns_walk_namespace+0x94/0x17b
[ 87.295727] [<ffffffff8125f202>] acpi_ev_install_space_handler+0x20f/0x225
[ 87.295727] [<ffffffff8125f256>] acpi_ev_install_region_handlers+0x3e/0x77
[ 87.295727] [<ffffffff81272d50>] acpi_enable_subsystem+0x64/0x8b
[ 87.295727] [<ffffffff81b41721>] acpi_bus_init+0x18/0x12a
[ 87.295727] [<ffffffff81b418a1>] acpi_init+0x6e/0xb4
[ 87.295727] [<ffffffff8100020a>] do_one_initcall+0x7a/0x130
[ 87.295727] [<ffffffff81b20c3b>] kernel_init+0xe1/0x15b
[ 87.295727] [<ffffffff8156f4d4>] kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10
[ 87.295727]
[ 87.295727] -> #0 (rcu_node_level_0){..-...}:
[ 87.295727] [<ffffffff81066eb0>] check_prev_add+0x68/0x20e
[ 87.295727] [<ffffffff810670e1>] check_prevs_add+0x8b/0x104
[ 87.295727] [<ffffffff810674c9>] validate_chain+0x36f/0x3ab
[ 87.295727] [<ffffffff81067b93>] __lock_acquire+0x369/0x3e2
[ 87.295727] [<ffffffff81068137>] lock_acquire+0xfc/0x14c
[ 87.295727] [<ffffffff81567951>] _raw_spin_lock+0x36/0x45
[ 87.295727] [<ffffffff810904a8>] rcu_read_unlock_special+0x8c/0x1d5
[ 87.295727] [<ffffffff81090640>] __rcu_read_unlock+0x4f/0xd7
[ 87.295727] [<ffffffff81027bb3>] rcu_read_unlock+0x21/0x23
[ 87.295727] [<ffffffff8102cc14>] cpuacct_charge+0x6c/0x75
[ 87.295727] [<ffffffff81030c3f>] update_curr+0x101/0x12e
[ 87.295727] [<ffffffff81031149>] check_preempt_wakeup+0xf7/0x23b
[ 87.295727] [<ffffffff8102ac93>] check_preempt_curr+0x2b/0x68
[ 87.295727] [<ffffffff81031cb9>] ttwu_do_wakeup+0x76/0x128
[ 87.295727] [<ffffffff81031dc2>] ttwu_do_activate.constprop.63+0x57/0x5c
[ 87.295727] [<ffffffff81031e0f>] scheduler_ipi+0x48/0x5d
[ 87.295727] [<ffffffff810177d5>] smp_reschedule_interrupt+0x16/0x18
[ 87.295727] [<ffffffff8156f273>] reschedule_interrupt+0x13/0x20
[ 87.295727] [<ffffffff810b6411>] rcu_read_unlock+0x21/0x23
[ 87.295727] [<ffffffff810b70dc>] find_get_page+0xa9/0xb9
[ 87.295727] [<ffffffff810b7840>] do_generic_file_read.constprop.13+0xae/0x46a
[ 87.295727] [<ffffffff810b8640>] generic_file_aio_read+0x1cd/0x232
[ 87.295727] [<ffffffff810f595d>] do_sync_read+0xba/0xfa
[ 87.295727] [<ffffffff810f60d7>] vfs_read+0xde/0x129
[ 87.295727] [<ffffffff810f6167>] sys_read+0x45/0x69
[ 87.295727] [<ffffffff8156e73b>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
[ 87.295727]
[ 87.295727] other info that might help us debug this:
[ 87.295727]
[ 87.295727] Chain exists of:
[ 87.295727] rcu_node_level_0 --> &p->pi_lock --> &rq->lock
[ 87.295727]
[ 87.295727] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
[ 87.295727]
[ 87.295727] CPU0 CPU1
[ 87.295727] ---- ----
[ 87.295727] lock(&rq->lock);
[ 87.295727] lock(&p->pi_lock);
[ 87.295727] lock(&rq->lock);
[ 87.295727] lock(rcu_node_level_0);
[ 87.295727]
[ 87.295727] *** DEADLOCK ***
[ 87.295727]
[ 87.295727] 1 lock held by fsck/3150:
[ 87.295727] #0: (&rq->lock){-.-.-.}, at: [<ffffffff81031dfb>] scheduler_ipi+0x34/0x5d
[ 87.295727]
[ 87.295727] stack backtrace:
[ 87.295727] Pid: 3150, comm: fsck Not tainted 2.6.39-rc5-mmotm0429 #1
[ 87.295727] Call Trace:
[ 87.295727] <IRQ> [<ffffffff815486ed>] print_circular_bug+0xc8/0xd9
[ 87.295727] [<ffffffff81066eb0>] check_prev_add+0x68/0x20e
[ 87.295727] [<ffffffff812d863a>] ? scsi_request_fn+0x30d/0x3de
[ 87.295727] [<ffffffff810670e1>] check_prevs_add+0x8b/0x104
[ 87.295727] [<ffffffff810674c9>] validate_chain+0x36f/0x3ab
[ 87.295727] [<ffffffff81067b93>] __lock_acquire+0x369/0x3e2
[ 87.295727] [<ffffffff810685f5>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0xfd/0x13b
[ 87.295727] [<ffffffff81567fb0>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x7b/0x80
[ 87.295727] [<ffffffff810904a8>] ? rcu_read_unlock_special+0x8c/0x1d5
[ 87.295727] [<ffffffff81068137>] lock_acquire+0xfc/0x14c
[ 87.295727] [<ffffffff810904a8>] ? rcu_read_unlock_special+0x8c/0x1d5
[ 87.295727] [<ffffffff81567951>] _raw_spin_lock+0x36/0x45
[ 87.295727] [<ffffffff810904a8>] ? rcu_read_unlock_special+0x8c/0x1d5
[ 87.295727] [<ffffffff810904a8>] rcu_read_unlock_special+0x8c/0x1d5
[ 87.295727] [<ffffffff81067f37>] ? __lock_release+0x8c/0x9c
[ 87.295727] [<ffffffff81090640>] __rcu_read_unlock+0x4f/0xd7
[ 87.295727] [<ffffffff81027bb3>] rcu_read_unlock+0x21/0x23
[ 87.295727] [<ffffffff8102cc14>] cpuacct_charge+0x6c/0x75
[ 87.295727] [<ffffffff81030c3f>] update_curr+0x101/0x12e
[ 87.295727] [<ffffffff81031149>] check_preempt_wakeup+0xf7/0x23b
[ 87.295727] [<ffffffff8102ac93>] check_preempt_curr+0x2b/0x68
[ 87.295727] [<ffffffff81031cb9>] ttwu_do_wakeup+0x76/0x128
[ 87.295727] [<ffffffff81031dc2>] ttwu_do_activate.constprop.63+0x57/0x5c
[ 87.295727] [<ffffffff81031e0f>] scheduler_ipi+0x48/0x5d
[ 87.295727] [<ffffffff810177d5>] smp_reschedule_interrupt+0x16/0x18
[ 87.295727] [<ffffffff8156f273>] reschedule_interrupt+0x13/0x20
[ 87.295727] <EOI> [<ffffffff8109041d>] ? rcu_read_unlock_special+0x1/0x1d5
[ 87.295727] [<ffffffff81090640>] ? __rcu_read_unlock+0x4f/0xd7
[ 87.295727] [<ffffffff810b6411>] rcu_read_unlock+0x21/0x23
[ 87.295727] [<ffffffff810b70dc>] find_get_page+0xa9/0xb9
[ 87.295727] [<ffffffff810b7840>] do_generic_file_read.constprop.13+0xae/0x46a
[ 87.295727] [<ffffffff810b8640>] generic_file_aio_read+0x1cd/0x232
[ 87.295727] [<ffffffff810f595d>] do_sync_read+0xba/0xfa
[ 87.295727] [<ffffffff810f5cc8>] ? rw_verify_area+0x13e/0x161
[ 87.295727] [<ffffffff810f60d7>] vfs_read+0xde/0x129
[ 87.295727] [<ffffffff810f6167>] sys_read+0x45/0x69
[ 87.295727] [<ffffffff8156e73b>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 227 bytes --]
reply other threads:[~2011-05-03 14:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=11287.1304432141@localhost \
--to=valdis.kletnieks@vt.edu \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).