From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Shaohua Li Subject: RE: [PATCH]Modular C-state policy Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2005 14:08:17 +0800 Message-ID: <1129097298.3928.3.camel@linux-hp.sh.intel.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Errors-To: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: To: "Brown, Len" Cc: acpi-dev , Dominik Brodowski , "Pallipadi, Venkatesh" , Thomas Renninger List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2005-10-12 at 13:26 +0800, Brown, Len wrote: > it would be helpful to have a prose summary > that explains the benefits of this patch > so that reviewers can make sense of the diff. This patch actually hasn't any benefit. It just makes it easier to add new C-state policy. Its C-sate algorithm is the same with current. The purpose is to make C-state policy smoothly move to new one. Thanks, Shaohua ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions, and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl