Re: [gpm] Untangling the sleep hotkey mess

[Richard Hughes <hughsient@gmail.com>]

On Sat, 2006-01-07 at 17:24 +0000, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> Currently, there are three ways that a sleep hotkey may generate an 
> event:
> 
> 1) Exposed in DSDT as an ACPI object, generates an ACPI notification 
> event (the "normal" way)
> 
> 2) Uses hardware-specific ACPI driver, generates an ACPI notification 
> event. Not exposed in the DSDT in any standard way (ibm-acpi, 
> toshiba-acpi, panasonic-acpi)
> 
> 3) Generates a scancode, which is picked up by the kernel and turned 
> into a keycode (HP laptops work like this)
> 
> This is all quite horribly confusing, and makes life miserable for 
> userspace.

Wholeheartedly agree.

>  I would like to suggest the following standardisation:
> 
> a) Hal should assume that all hardware has a sleep key, since there's no 
> way to actually tell.
> 
> b) Events generated in cases (1) and (2) should, for now, be caught by 
> acpid (or something similar) and then fed back into the input layer via 
> uinput. This should be scancode 142, which will end up as X keycode 223.

Yes, I proposed something similar here
[http://www.nabble.com/ACPI-to-uinput-bridge-t409384.html] -- using HAL
and uinput to send the keys to user-programs.

> c) Most keyboards in case (3) will already send scancode 142. For 
> laptops, those that shouldn't should be remapped at boot time by 
> checking the system DMI information and consulting a lookup table.

Yes, perhaps using the existing HAL infrastructure with FDI lookup
tables? We already have a HAL addon for watching ACPI events, and doing
things like refreshing the battery values, and emitting conditions for
the common buttons (lid, sleep, power) -- we could just extend this code
in the HAL addon.

The HAL addon is well tested, and plays nice with acpid if required.

> Rationale:
> 
> Having one type of event rather than three makes it easier for userspace 
> coders. Choosing to do it through the input layer lets people take 
> advantage of pre-existing code for binding userspace events to keyboard 
> events, and is significantly easier to do than getting keyboard events 
> back to the ACPI layer. Keycode 142 is chosen because it's what 
> Microsoft uses, and so most manufacturers who have taken this approach 
> have copied them.

Can we not go further and define Dock/UnDock,
BrightnessUp/BrightnessDown, Hibernate, etc?

Richard.