From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Felix Kuehling Subject: RE: Power-button event after resume from S3 Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2006 16:47:31 -0400 Message-ID: <1144702051.340.53.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <554C5F4C5BA7384EB2B412FD46A3BAD11906E5@pdsmsx411.ccr.corp.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from outbound-ash.frontbridge.com ([206.16.192.249]:18083 "EHLO outbound2-ash-R.bigfish.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750765AbWDJUrj (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Apr 2006 16:47:39 -0400 Received: from outbound2-ash.bigfish.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by outbound2-ash-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66C2574B95F for ; Mon, 10 Apr 2006 20:47:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail64-ash-R.bigfish.com (unknown [172.18.2.1]) by outbound2-ash.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E39774B94B for ; Mon, 10 Apr 2006 20:47:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail64-ash.bigfish.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail64-ash-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52EB34E75DE for ; Mon, 10 Apr 2006 20:47:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail4.ati.com (h209-50-91-134.gtconnect.net [209.50.91.134]) (using TLSv1 with cipher EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail64-ash.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 293664E71EB for ; Mon, 10 Apr 2006 20:47:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from torcaexgw1.atitech.com (exchange.atitech.com [172.24.5.245]) by mail4.ati.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k3AKlTmj025535 for ; Mon, 10 Apr 2006 16:47:38 -0400 In-Reply-To: <554C5F4C5BA7384EB2B412FD46A3BAD11906E5@pdsmsx411.ccr.corp.intel.com> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: "Yu, Luming" Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, Matthew Tippett , Chang-Hwa Lee , Samuel Li On Fri, 2006-07-04 at 10:49 +0800, Yu, Luming wrote: > >Are there plans for a real fix for this problem, either in the > >kernel or > >in acpid? > > > > We need a patch to handle the wakeup power-button event. > Do you want to hack a patch for this? Before working on a patch I'd like to be sure that there is a general consensus that this is indeed The Right Way (TM) to fix the problem. Whose blessing would a patch need before being accepted? Thanks, Felix > > Probably, you need to hack acpi_button_notify. > like: > > if (acpi_in_suspend) > don't generate event. > > --Luming >