Re: 2.6.16-rc5: known regressions [TP 600X S3, vanilla DSDT]

Sanjoy Mahajan
2006-03-18T15:48:29Z

> Please try additional ugly hack
> 5. in acpi_os_queue_for_execution:
> if(acpi_in_suspend == YES)
> do nothing.

Am compiling it. If acpi_in_suspend, I've had it do
return_ACPI_STATUS(AE_BAD_PARAMETER). Is there a better error code to
use? I didn't want to use AE_OK, since the caller might think that
the function will be executed eventually, and might do something silly
like wait for it to be executed -- and produce another hang. I didn't
know, but to be safe I wanted to return an error code.

> Also, please add acpi_debug_layer=0x10 acpi_debug_leve=0x10 boot
> option, then you can observe what methods were executed before
> suspend.

That's in my lilo.conf so all kernels I test use those options. I can
send you the dmesgs from the suspends without the ugly hack (and will
send them from the upcoming suspends, with the ugly hack).

-Sanjoy

`Never underestimate the evil of which men of power are capable.'
--Bertrand Russell, _War Crimes in Vietnam_, chapter 1.