From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: R Cerqueira Subject: Re: [Acpi4asus-user] [patch 1/6] asus_acpi: W3000 support Date: Sat, 01 Jul 2006 23:46:23 +0100 Message-ID: <1151793983.27214.4.camel@frolic> References: <20060630193130.GA11609@hell.org.pl> <1151765434.30054.9.camel@nouse.suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from onyx.ip.pt ([195.23.92.252]:16304 "EHLO mail.isp.novis.pt") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751258AbWGAWq0 (ORCPT ); Sat, 1 Jul 2006 18:46:26 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1151765434.30054.9.camel@nouse.suse.de> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Timo Hoenig Cc: Karol Kozimor , akpm@osdl.org, "Brown, Len" , acpi4asus-user@lists.sourceforge.net, marekw1977@yahoo.com.au, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 2006-07-01 at 16:50 +0200, Timo Hoenig wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, 2006-06-30 at 21:31 +0200, Karol Kozimor wrote: > > > I would really prefer this to be respun and applied *over* the batch > > of patches I sent you *in mid-January*, as they rework some significant > > portions of the code this patch touches and it would be a real PITA to > > respin that batch instead of this little piece here. > > Updating ASUS ACPI to 0.30 would be absolutely be adorable. > > We have applied the patches for SL 10.1 as well as for SLES 10 and SLED > 10. My bug count for the driver is zero with regard to those patches. Since we're talking about applying patches, it would be nice if the W5F patch I sent to the list back on April 26th could go in as well. Anything wrong with it? -- Ricardo Cerqueira