From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Renninger Subject: RE: ACPICA regression checker Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 17:11:22 +0200 Message-ID: <1152717082.3570.277.camel@queen.suse.de> References: <1152688564.3570.270.camel@queen.suse.de> Reply-To: trenn@suse.de Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:22703 "EHLO mx2.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751072AbWGLPJ6 (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Jul 2006 11:09:58 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1152688564.3570.270.camel@queen.suse.de> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: "Brown, Len" Cc: "Moore, Robert" , "Yu, Ling L" , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org I didn't see this is going to linux-acpi... these links are using an internal proxy the outside address is bugzilla.novell.com: > http://rudin.suse.de:8888/show_bug.cgi?id=189488 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=189488 > -> Bogus _PSS package, customer says that already worked. Maybe with PSB > fallback to use legacy AMD tables, don't know... If that already worked > (with ACPI) we should have seen the regression by simple > disassembling/recompiling. > > http://rudin.suse.de:8888/show_bug.cgi?id=160671 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=160671 > -> Ok, this one would not have been found by simple > disassembling/recompiling. > > Nothing critical, not really worth looking at. Thomas