From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jim Gettys Subject: Re: [OLPC-devel] Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/2] ACPI: Idle Processor PM Improvements Date: Tue, 05 Sep 2006 10:31:50 -0400 Message-ID: <1157466710.6011.262.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <20060830194317.GA9116@srcf.ucam.org> <200608311713.21618.bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> <1157070616.7974.232.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20060904130933.GC6279@ucw.cz> Reply-To: jg@laptop.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20060904130933.GC6279@ucw.cz> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Pavel Machek Cc: Bjorn Helgaas , Matthew Garrett , "Brown, Len" , Linux Kernel ML , Dominik Brodowski , ACPI ML , Adam Belay , "Pallipadi, Venkatesh" , Arjan van de Ven , devel@laptop.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2006-09-04 at 13:09 +0000, Pavel Machek wrote: > > 2.4 and 2.6 are *very* different here. You'll probably need to optimize freezer > in 2.6 a bit... > Among other problems: e.g. 2.4 did not automatically do a VT switch; 2.6 does; we'll have to have a way to signal "we're a sane display driver; don't switch away from me on suspend". - Jim -- Jim Gettys One Laptop Per Child