From: Peter Clifton <pcjc2@cam.ac.uk>
To: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: HP Compaq nc6320 SSDT
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2006 21:51:50 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1160513510.8655.12.camel@pcjc2lap> (raw)
Hi,
Just for larks, I decided to iasl -d my SSDT, and found the following
horridness:
Intel ACPI Component Architecture
ASL Optimizing Compiler version 20060608 [Jun 29 2006]
Copyright (C) 2000 - 2006 Intel Corporation
Supports ACPI Specification Revision 3.0a
ssdt.orig.dsl 117: Store (C0E0, 0x00)
Error 4094 - ^ syntax error,
unexpected PARSEOP_INTEGER
ssdt.orig.dsl 119: If (And (C33D, 0x01))
Error 4094 - syntax error, unexpected ')' ^
ssdt.orig.dsl 123: Else
Error 4094 - ^ syntax error, unexpected
PARSEOP_ELSE
ssdt.orig.dsl 137: Store (C0DD (0x00, 0x01), C34C)
Error 4062 - Object does not exist ^
(C34C)
ssdt.orig.dsl 138: If (And (C33D, 0x04))
Error 4062 - Object does not exist ^ (C33D)
ssdt.orig.dsl 140: Store (C0DF (0x00, 0x01),
C34D)
Error 4062 - Object does not
exist ^ (C34D)
ssdt.orig.dsl 144: Store (C34C, C34D)
Error 4062 - Object does not exist ^ (C34C)
ssdt.orig.dsl 144: Store (C34C, C34D)
Error 4062 - Object does not exist ^ (C34D)
ssdt.orig.dsl 148: Return
Error 4094 - ^ syntax error, unexpected
PARSEOP_RETURN, expecting $end
ASL Input: ssdt.orig.dsl - 149 lines, 4718 bytes, 72 keywords
Compilation complete. 9 Errors, 0 Warnings, 0 Remarks, 7 Optimizations
To make it compile nicely, I looked at the DSDT and fixed up the
external method calls (Much of the typing in the External definitions
was wrong), checked the number of arguments, and noted the missing
parenthesis around the arguments which should have been passed to these
calls. (Possibly a decompile bug due to the erronous External()
definitions?)
Diff is:
--- ssdt.orig.dsl 2006-10-10 21:46:26.000000000 +0100
+++ ssdt.dsl 2006-10-10 21:38:55.000000000 +0100
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
* Intel ACPI Component Architecture
* AML Disassembler version 20060608
*
- * Disassembly of ssdt.orig.aml, Tue Oct 10 21:46:26 2006
+ * Disassembly of ssdt.asl, Tue Oct 10 16:21:27 2006
*
*
* Original Table Header:
@@ -15,19 +15,19 @@
* Creator ID "MSFT"
* Creator Revision 0x0100000E (16777230)
*/
-DefinitionBlock ("ssdt.orig.aml", "SSDT", 1, "HP ", "HPQSAT",
0x00000001)
+DefinitionBlock ("ssdt.aml", "SSDT", 1, "HP ", "HPQSAT", 0x00000001)
{
External (C0E5, MethodObj) // 6 Arguments
External (C0E1, MethodObj) // 5 Arguments
- External (C236)
+ External (C236, BuffObj)
External (C0DF, MethodObj) // 2 Arguments
- External (C0E0, IntObj)
+ External (C0E0, MethodObj) // 1 Arguments
External (C0DD, MethodObj) // 2 Arguments
- External (C239, IntObj)
- External (C238)
- External (\_SB_.C240, IntObj)
+ External (C239, BuffObj)
+ External (C238, IntObj)
+ External (\_SB_.C240, MethodObj) // 2 Arguments
External (\_SB_.C23A, MethodObj) // 4 Arguments
- External (\_SB_.C143)
+ External (\_SB_.C143, MethodObj) // 0 Arguments
External (\_SB_.C002, DeviceObj)
External (\_SB_.C002.C0D5, DeviceObj)
@@ -114,8 +114,7 @@
CreateDWordField (Local0, 0x0C, C34D)
CreateDWordField (Local0, 0x10, C33D)
Store (C0DD (0x00, 0x00), C33B)
- Store (C0E0, 0x00)
- C33D
+ Store (C0E0 (0x00), C33D )
If (And (C33D, 0x01))
{
Store (C0DF (0x00, 0x00), C33C)
@@ -174,11 +173,7 @@
}
Store (C0E1 (0x00, 0x00, C33B, C33D, Local1),
Local2)
- Store (C0E5 (0x00, 0x00, C33C, C33D, Local1,
Local3), \_SB.C23A)
- Local2
- Local3
- Local1
- C33A
+ Store (C0E5 (0x00, 0x00, C33C, C33D, Local1,
Local3), \_SB.C23A (Local2, Local3, Local1, C33A ))
}
}
}
@@ -188,9 +183,7 @@
Name (_ADR, 0x00)
Method (_GTF, 0, NotSerialized)
{
- Return (\_SB.C240)
- C33A
- 0x00
+ Return (\_SB.C240 (C33A, 0x00))
}
}
}
Does this fix seem reasonable to anyone.. how can I override the SSDT in
linux (I've got the DSDT over-ridden, no problem).
Clearly to verify this properly, I need to post the DSDT and SSDT in
their entirety, please let me know if I should post them to this list,
or privately email me and I'll send them.
Are these problems "real", or are they simply the symptom of decompiling
the SSDT in the absence of context from the DSDT?
Regards
Peter Clifton
next reply other threads:[~2006-10-10 20:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-10-10 20:51 Peter Clifton [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-10-10 20:59 HP Compaq nc6320 SSDT Moore, Robert
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1160513510.8655.12.camel@pcjc2lap \
--to=pcjc2@cam.ac.uk \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox