From: Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de>
To: Alexey Starikovskiy <alexey.y.starikovskiy@linux.intel.com>
Cc: "Brown, Len" <len.brown@intel.com>,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, "Moore,
Robert" <robert.moore@intel.com>
Subject: Re: new pmtools available for testing
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 16:25:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1164209126.3721.363.camel@queen.suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4564607B.2050604@linux.intel.com>
On Wed, 2006-11-22 at 17:36 +0300, Alexey Starikovskiy wrote:
> Thomas Renninger wrote:
> > On Tue, 2006-11-21 at 21:24 +0300, Alexey Starikovskiy wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> acpixtract perl-script is being replaced by C xtract utility. Please test.
> >> Advances are:
> >> - Perl not required :)
> >> - no 64k output limit of perl-script
> >> - --list option shows all tables in the file
> >> - unified interface with acpidump
> >> - faster(?)
> >>
> >> Thanks in advance,
> >>
> > Is this acpixtract that already existed in ACPICA since some time and
> > now moved to pmtools?
> >
> Nope, it's duplicated effort.
Hmm, you should talk to (I think acpixtract C prog came from) Bob?
Someone should decide which should be the final one everybody should
use...
If one distri or application starts to package and use the one, others
start to use the other, we might have compatibility problems in some
scripts in future.
The linuxfirmwarekit makes use of ACPICA's acpixtract AFAIK (hardcoded
by something like system("acpixtract acpidump");).
I also packaged this one into SUSE pmtools package (since SUSE 10.1?).
-> I'd prefer to stick to the ACPICA's acpixtract...
Thanks for any clarifications on this one,
Thomas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-11-22 15:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-11-21 18:24 new pmtools available for testing Alexey Starikovskiy
2006-11-21 18:27 ` Alexey Starikovskiy
2006-11-22 13:55 ` Thomas Renninger
2006-11-22 14:36 ` Alexey Starikovskiy
2006-11-22 15:25 ` Thomas Renninger [this message]
2006-11-22 16:40 ` Alexey Starikovskiy
2006-12-10 15:50 ` Mattia Dongili
2006-12-10 17:11 ` Alexey Starikovskiy
2006-12-11 18:20 ` Len Brown
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-11-27 18:13 Moore, Robert
2006-11-28 10:03 ` Thomas Renninger
2006-11-28 10:24 ` Alexey Starikovskiy
2006-11-28 11:14 ` Thomas Renninger
2006-11-28 14:00 ` Alexey Starikovskiy
2006-11-29 16:31 ` Bruno Ducrot
2006-12-12 22:35 Moore, Robert
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1164209126.3721.363.camel@queen.suse.de \
--to=trenn@suse.de \
--cc=alexey.y.starikovskiy@linux.intel.com \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robert.moore@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox