From: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
To: len.brown@intel.com
Cc: "linux-acpi@vger" <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
david-b@pacbell.net, mjg59@srcf.ucam.org, pavel@ucw.cz,
randy.dunlap@oracle.com, fiodor.f.suietov@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] [-mm]: ACPI: duplicate ACPI procfs functions in sysfs
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 14:53:02 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1169103182.1585.67.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1168083306.5619.34.camel@localhost.localdomain>
> Patch 01:
> add a Kconfig option which is used to make ACPI procfs interface configurable.
> This will be used by all the following sysfs conversion patches.
>
> Patch 02:
> add ACPI debug attribute in sysfs.
> By applying this patch, /proc/acpi/debug_layer && debug_level is deprecated by
> /sys/module/acpi/parameter/debug_layer && debug_level.
>
> Patch 03-05:
> add ACPI sleep attributes in sysfs.
> /proc/acpi/sleep is already deprecated by /sys/power/state.
> /proc/acpi/alarm is deprecated by /sys/power/alarm.
> For those devices that support "wake" attribute, two files, "sleep_state" and "wakeup", are created for these devices.
> "sleep_state" indicates the lowest sleeping state that can be entered while still providing wake functionality.
> "wakeup" can be used to enable/disable the device's ability to wake a sleeping system.
> So /proc/acpi/wakeup is deprecated by /sys/devices/acpi_system/.../xxx/sleep_state && wakeup.
>
Len,
Now, I'm thinking of dropping patch 03-05.
"alarm" is ACPI specific and /sys/power/alarm is not a good idea.
In addition, it can't handle multiple RTCs as David described.
So, if the new rtc-cmos driver written by David works well,
this's not needed any more. :)
"wakeup" attribute for ACPI wakeup devices is in the wish list.
1. Try to map ACPI devices to the physical devices.
It's not very easy, as we can not find a generic method to
map ACPI wakeup devices to physical devices. So I have to
divide them into several groups, e.g. PCI, legacy serial,
legacy PS2, etc. And verify which group the ACPI device
belongs to.
2. add "wakeup" properly to /sys/device/(not ACPI)/...
I'll investigate the possibility of integrating this one into
/sys/device/.../power/wakeup.
3. consolidate all wakeup devices in one place for convenience.
E.g. /sys/power/wakeup/, symbolic links with useful names.
(note that links here are from "real" devices node in sysfs,
so it's a generic interface for systems both w/ and w/o ACPI)
4. remove /proc/acpi/wakeup,
since it's replaced by /sys/power/wakeup/...
> Patch 06:
> add ACPI info in sysfs which indicates ACPICA version.
> /sys/firmware/acpi/info is create and /proc/acpi/info is marked as deprecated.
I'll refresh the patch 01,02,06 and resend them.
Thanks for your comments, David, Matthew, Pavel, Randy and Suietov. :)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-01-18 6:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-01-06 11:35 [PATCH 0/6] [-mm]: ACPI: duplicate ACPI procfs functions in sysfs Zhang Rui
2007-01-06 22:21 ` David Brownell
2007-01-07 5:54 ` [linux-pm] " Matthew Garrett
2007-01-08 3:31 ` David Brownell
2007-01-08 13:10 ` Pavel Machek
2007-01-25 4:14 ` Len Brown
2007-01-25 5:50 ` Matthew Garrett
2007-01-25 9:35 ` David Brownell
2007-01-08 11:40 ` Zhang Rui
2007-01-08 13:13 ` Pavel Machek
2007-01-25 2:28 ` Len Brown
2007-01-25 12:08 ` Pavel Machek
2007-01-25 13:15 ` David Brownell
2007-01-25 19:51 ` Pavel Machek
2007-01-26 1:36 ` Zhang Rui
2007-01-10 20:53 ` David Brownell
2007-01-25 4:17 ` Len Brown
2007-01-25 13:15 ` Pavel Machek
2007-01-25 3:33 ` [linux-pm] " Len Brown
2007-01-25 3:28 ` Len Brown
2007-01-25 9:54 ` David Brownell
2007-01-25 19:37 ` Pavel Machek
2007-01-07 11:15 ` Pavel Machek
2007-01-25 2:03 ` Len Brown
2007-01-25 2:52 ` Nigel Cunningham
2007-01-25 8:17 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-01-25 10:00 ` [linux-pm] " David Brownell
2007-01-18 6:53 ` Zhang Rui [this message]
2007-01-21 5:48 ` [PATCH 0/3] " Zhang Rui
2007-01-25 3:50 ` Len Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1169103182.1585.67.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=rui.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=david-b@pacbell.net \
--cc=fiodor.f.suietov@intel.com \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mjg59@srcf.ucam.org \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox