From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Shaohua Li Subject: Re: ACPI in Windows Vista Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 11:39:26 +0800 Message-ID: <1177385966.4635.5.camel@sli10-conroe.sh.intel.com> References: <200704231458.31767.lenb@kernel.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mga01.intel.com ([192.55.52.88]:1574 "EHLO mga01.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1161556AbXDXDmx (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Apr 2007 23:42:53 -0400 In-Reply-To: <200704231458.31767.lenb@kernel.org> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Len Brown Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2007-04-24 at 02:58 +0800, Len Brown wrote: > It is useful to see what Microsoft is doing with ACPI in Vista -- > as that shapes many of the BIOS implementations that Linux will > encounter: > > http://download.microsoft.com/download/5/b/9/5b97017b-e28a-4bae-ba48-174cf47d23cd/CPA002_WH06.ppt vista disable MSI per fadt.iapc_boot_arch flags, looks we should do the same. This means we don't need MSI quirk too. I'm curious why firmware shouldn't change low 1M memory between sleep, considering some ranges are reserved. Thanks, Shaohua