From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Cc: venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com,
Michal Piotrowski <michal.k.k.piotrowski@gmail.com>,
stable@kernel.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, Jeff Chua <jeff.chua.linux@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: send_IPI_mask_bitmask() (Re: 2.6.21 known regressions (v2) (for -stable team))
Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 10:25:22 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1177835122.5791.4.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200704290134.39048.lenb@kernel.org>
On Sun, 2007-04-29 at 01:34 -0400, Len Brown wrote:
> > clockevents_notify() is called with the power verify information for an
> > offline CPU. I can handle this in the clockevents code, but I think acpi
> > is the correct place.
>
> So the CONFIG_GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS=y case is broken,
> but the CONFIG_GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS=n below is okay?
> Not immediately clear why both cases can't fail.
True, that's strange. Even more strange is that 2.6.21-rc7 does not have
the problem, but 2.6.21 has. We did not change anything in those code
pathes between rc7 and final.
Jeff, can you please verify which -rcX was the last which did not have
this problem.
Thanks,
tglx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-04-29 8:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-04-28 16:27 2.6.21 known regressions (v2) (for -stable team) Michal Piotrowski
2007-04-28 16:52 ` Gene Heskett
2007-04-28 17:18 ` Michal Piotrowski
2007-04-28 17:52 ` Gene Heskett
2007-04-28 18:19 ` [stable] " Greg KH
2007-04-28 21:21 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2007-04-29 1:25 ` Greg KH
2007-04-28 16:58 ` Thomas Gleixner
2007-04-29 5:34 ` send_IPI_mask_bitmask() (Re: 2.6.21 known regressions (v2) (for -stable team)) Len Brown
2007-04-29 8:25 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2007-04-28 18:03 ` 2.6.21 known regressions (v2) (for -stable team) Thomas Meyer
2007-04-28 19:06 ` Diego Calleja
2007-04-30 21:30 ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-04-30 22:35 ` Håkan Lindqvist
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1177835122.5791.4.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jeff.chua.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michal.k.k.piotrowski@gmail.com \
--cc=stable@kernel.org \
--cc=venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox