From: Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de>
To: david@lang.hm
Cc: linux-acpi <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Subject: [Fwd: Re: long-term regression - Parallel Port broken?]
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 13:28:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1183030080.4249.172.camel@queen.suse.de> (raw)
Hi David,
Could this problem have to do with this one:
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=180390
Tell me if you have problems accessing the bug, it should be public.
Unfortunately the ongoing of the bug stopped a bit for various reasons.
The first comments pointed in the wrong direction, it's getting
interesting when Vojtech joined the conversation and things pointed to
acpi, possibly acpipnp.
First a collection of acpidump outputs of affected machines would be
great, hopefully other reporters start helping again...
If it is the same bug, it's interesting that 2.6.18-rc3 worked for you
(vanilla or gentoo?). Because SLE[DS]10 is 2.6.16 based, we could have
backported the bug and that might help finding it?
Thanks,
Thomas
PS: I stripped the CC list, things seem to point to acpi...
PSS: Has there already been a bug at bugzilla.kernel.org opened where
dmesg, acpidump and other info can be reviewed? If not this should be
done.
On Wed, 2007-06-27 at 09:19 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> [adding linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org]
>
> On Wed, 27 Jun 2007 00:38:17 -0700 (PDT) david@lang.hm wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 26 Jun 2007, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, 25 Jun 2007 15:56:17 -0700 (PDT) david@lang.hm wrote:
> > >
> > >> due to the size the files are posted at http://linux.lang.hm/linux
> > >>
> > >> let me know what else I can send to help.
> > >>
> > >> David Lang
> > >
> > >
> > > I suggest that you test 2.6.22-rcN using one or both of these
> > > boot options:
> > >
> > > noisapnp
> > > pnpacpi=off
> > >
> > > Somewhere between 2.6.18 and 2.6.22-development, the ACPI config
> > > symbol also starting enabling (selecting) PNP. That's one of many
> > > differences....
> >
> > with the 2.6.22-rc4 kernel that I was useing earlier, adding these two
> > options clears up the problem. Thanks.
> >
> > should I test the two individually? or just plan on useing both from now
> > on?
>
> Yes, please test them individually. I expect that just one of them
> will suffice, but I don't know which one.
>
> > I normally disable PnP (both ISA and PCI), should I leave it enabled with
> > the newer kernels and this motherboard?
>
> ACPI recently began enabling (selecting) PNP for you...
>
> How do you normally disable PCI PNP?
>
> What kind of hardware is this? Please show us lspci output.
>
> > > I would also disable CONFIG_USB_USS720, at least for testing.
> >
> > for ease of testing (I got time to reboot the box around midnight) I used
> > the same config as before, so this is still on.
> >
> > David Lang
> >
> > >
> > >> On Mon, 25 Jun 2007, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 15:40:28 -0700
> > >>> From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
> > >>> To: david@lang.hm
> > >>> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
> > >>> linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> > >>> Subject: Re: long-term regression
> > >>>
> > >>> david@lang.hm wrote:
> > >>>> On Thu, 21 Jun 2007, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 08:36:59 -0700
> > >>>>> From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
> > >>>>> To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> > >>>>> Cc: david@lang.hm, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
> > >>>>> linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> > >>>>> Subject: Re: long-term regression
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> On Thu, 21 Jun 2007 05:28:07 -0700 Andrew Morton wrote:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>> On Sun, 17 Jun 2007 10:57:55 -0700 (PDT) david@lang.hm wrote:
> > >>>>>>> I haven't had time to bisect this, but I'm having a problem on a
> > >>>>>>> AMD64
> > >>>>>>> gentoo system where the printer doesn't work with recent kernels.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> 2.6.18-rc3 worked
> > >>>>>>> 2.6.21.1 doesn't
> > >>>>>>> 2.6.22-rc4 doesn't
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> unfortunantly the system is gooted on 2.6.18 at the moment and I'm
> > >>>>>>> out of
> > >>>>>>> town so my ability to test is limited I can provide the 2.6.22-rc4
> > >>>>>>> (attached) and 2.6.18-rc3 configs.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> dmesg appears to show the port being detected, but writes to the
> > >>>>>>> port
> > >>>>>>> under newer kernels appear to complete, but no data gets to the
> > >>>>>>> printer.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> any suggestions other then doing the large bisect?
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> That would be good, thanks. Please be sure to cc linux-usb-devel on
> > >>>>>> the results.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> OK, I'm curious about how someone deduced that this is a problem
> > >>>>> with a USB printer vs. parallel port printer since the config file has:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> CONFIG_PRINTER=y
> > >>>>> CONFIG_USB_PRINTER=y
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> The kernel boot log should probably be posted also.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> here is the dmesg from 2.6.22-rc4 and kern.log showing 2.6.22.-rc4 and
> > >>>> 2.6.180rc3
> > >>>>
> > >>>> the printer not working is the parallel port.
> > >>>
> > >>> This email didn't show up on lkml or linux-usb-devel due to size limits (it
> > >>> was 900+ KB).
> > >>>
> > >>> David, please send your working 2.6.18 config file.
> > >>>
> > >>> Can you post the kernel log files on the web somewhere?
>
> ---
next reply other threads:[~2007-06-28 11:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-06-28 11:28 Thomas Renninger [this message]
2007-07-06 16:38 ` [Fwd: Re: long-term regression - Parallel Port broken?] Bjorn Helgaas
2007-07-06 21:20 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2007-07-17 22:08 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2007-07-22 2:09 ` david
2007-07-24 21:40 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2007-07-30 1:22 ` david
2007-07-30 3:41 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2007-07-30 3:46 ` david
2007-07-30 3:59 ` david
2007-07-30 14:08 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2008-05-27 23:11 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2008-05-28 9:19 ` david
2008-06-13 17:45 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2007-07-22 2:04 ` david
2007-07-22 2:44 ` Thomas Renninger
2007-07-22 22:05 ` david
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1183030080.4249.172.camel@queen.suse.de \
--to=trenn@suse.de \
--cc=david@lang.hm \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox