From: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: pm list <linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
linux acpi <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>, Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
Subject: Re: [patch] hibernation: utilize ACPI hardware signature
Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2008 09:46:49 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1199670409.13339.2.camel@sli10-desk.sh.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200801042144.20279.rjw@sisk.pl>
On Sat, 2008-01-05 at 04:44 +0800, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Friday, 4 of January 2008, Shaohua Li wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 2008-01-04 at 01:04 +0800, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > On Thursday, 3 of January 2008, Shaohua Li wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, 2008-01-02 at 22:05 +0800, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > > On Wednesday, 2 of January 2008, Shaohua Li wrote:
> > > > > > ACPI defines a hardware signature. BIOS calculates the
> signature
> > > > > > according to hardware configure, if hardware changes, the
> > > signature
> > > > > will
> > > > > > change, in this case, S4 resume should fail.
> > > > >
> > > > > The idea is fine, but I'd prefer to do that in a more
> > > straightforward
> > > > > way.
> > > > > Namely, we can just:
> > > > > * write the signature into a variable in, for example,
> > > > > acpi_hibernation_prepare() (then, the "old" signature value
> will
> > > be
> > > > > automatically saved in the image)
> > > > > * compare it with a the "new" value read from the BIOS in
> > > > > acpi_hibernation_leave() and panic if there's a mismatch
> > > > > * add a configuration option to disable this behavior (just in
> > > case)
> > > > > This way we can avoid modifying the entire generic interface
> to
> > > add
> > > > > the feature
> > > > > specific to ACPI.
> > > > it would be better we do the check in boot kernel.
> > > Franky, I think we should also check in the image kernel, in case
> the
> > > boot
> > > one doesn't support ACPI as I said.
> > Ok, makes sense. I changed to check the signature
> in .higberation_leave
>
> Thanks, comments below.
>
> > Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/acpi/sleep/main.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
> >
> > Index: linux/drivers/acpi/sleep/main.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- linux.orig/drivers/acpi/sleep/main.c 2008-01-03
> 13:37:08.000000000 +0800
> > +++ linux/drivers/acpi/sleep/main.c 2008-01-04 13:36:10.000000000
> +0800
> > @@ -256,6 +256,17 @@ static int acpi_hibernation_enter(void)
> > return ACPI_SUCCESS(status) ? 0 : -EFAULT;
> > }
> >
> > +static unsigned long s4_hardware_signature;
> > +static struct acpi_table_facs *facs;
> > +static int nosigcheck;
>
> Use bool perhaps?
>
> > +
> > +static int __init acpi_s4_nosigcheck(char *str)
> > +{
> > + nosigcheck = 1;
>
> And "true" here?
>
> > + return 1;
> > +}
> > +__setup("acpi_s4_nosigcheck", acpi_s4_nosigcheck);
> > +
>
> Please put this function at the end of the file. Also, I'd call it
> "acpi_s4_nosig", but whatever.
Fixed all except this one, the routine is defined with HIBERATION
configed.
Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
---
drivers/acpi/sleep/main.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 22 insertions(+)
Index: linux/drivers/acpi/sleep/main.c
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/drivers/acpi/sleep/main.c 2008-01-04 13:44:40.000000000 +0800
+++ linux/drivers/acpi/sleep/main.c 2008-01-07 09:31:42.000000000 +0800
@@ -256,6 +256,17 @@ static int acpi_hibernation_enter(void)
return ACPI_SUCCESS(status) ? 0 : -EFAULT;
}
+static unsigned long s4_hardware_signature;
+static struct acpi_table_facs *facs;
+static bool nosigcheck;
+
+static int __init acpi_s4_nosigcheck(char *str)
+{
+ nosigcheck = true;
+ return 1;
+}
+__setup("acpi_s4_nosigcheck", acpi_s4_nosigcheck);
+
static void acpi_hibernation_leave(void)
{
/*
@@ -263,6 +274,10 @@ static void acpi_hibernation_leave(void)
* enable it here.
*/
acpi_enable();
+ if (facs && s4_hardware_signature != facs->hardware_signature) {
+ printk(KERN_EMERG"PM: Hardware changed in the S4 circle, can't resume\n");
+ panic("S4 resume error");
+ }
}
static void acpi_hibernation_finish(void)
@@ -448,6 +463,13 @@ int __init acpi_sleep_init(void)
hibernation_set_ops(&acpi_hibernation_ops);
sleep_states[ACPI_STATE_S4] = 1;
printk(" S4");
+ if (!nosigcheck) {
+ acpi_get_table_by_index(ACPI_TABLE_INDEX_FACS,
+ (struct acpi_table_header **)&facs);
+ if (facs)
+ s4_hardware_signature =
+ facs->hardware_signature;
+ }
}
#endif
status = acpi_get_sleep_type_data(ACPI_STATE_S5, &type_a, &type_b);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-01-07 1:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-01-02 6:59 [patch] hibernation: utilize ACPI hardware signature Shaohua Li
2008-01-02 7:37 ` [linux-pm] " Maxim Levitsky
2008-01-02 9:29 ` Johannes Berg
2008-01-03 1:52 ` Shaohua Li
2008-01-02 10:08 ` Erik Andrén
2008-01-02 14:12 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-01-02 21:25 ` [linux-pm] " Nigel Cunningham
2008-01-02 22:18 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-01-03 8:26 ` Nigel Cunningham
2008-01-02 14:05 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-01-02 21:26 ` [linux-pm] " Nigel Cunningham
2008-01-02 22:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-01-03 8:31 ` Nigel Cunningham
2008-01-03 16:58 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-01-03 22:10 ` Nigel Cunningham
2008-01-03 5:36 ` Shaohua Li
2008-01-03 17:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-01-04 5:41 ` Shaohua Li
2008-01-04 20:44 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-01-07 1:46 ` Shaohua Li [this message]
2008-01-10 23:39 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-01-11 1:07 ` Shaohua Li
2008-01-11 17:20 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1199670409.13339.2.camel@sli10-desk.sh.intel.com \
--to=shaohua.li@intel.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=pavel@suse.cz \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox