From: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>,
Qais Yousef <qyousef@layalina.io>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
Prashanth Prakash <pprakash@codeaurora.org>,
Pierre Gondois <pierre.gondois@arm.com>,
Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/4] cpufreq: CPPC: Avoid using CPUFREQ_ETERNAL as transition delay
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2025 11:36:43 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <11e2cb33-05cd-4ef3-86e6-ef57e5f1222f@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <22867781.EfDdHjke4D@rafael.j.wysocki>
On 9/25/2025 10:44 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
>
> If cppc_get_transition_latency() returns CPUFREQ_ETERNAL to indicate a
> failure to retrieve the transition latency value from the platform
> firmware, the CPPC cpufreq driver will use that value (converted to
> microseconds) as the policy transition delay, but it is way too large
> for any practical use.
>
> Address this by making the driver use the cpufreq's default
> transition latency value (in microseconds) as the transition delay
> if CPUFREQ_ETERNAL is returned by cppc_get_transition_latency().
>
> Fixes: d4f3388afd48 ("cpufreq / CPPC: Set platform specific transition_delay_us")
> Cc: 5.19+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 5.19
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mario Limonciello (AMD) <superm1@kernel.org>> ---
> drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c | 14 ++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c
> @@ -308,6 +308,16 @@ static int cppc_verify_policy(struct cpu
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static unsigned int get_transition_latency_from_cppc(unsigned int cpu)
> +{
> + unsigned int transition_latency_ns = cppc_get_transition_latency(cpu);
> +
> + if (transition_latency_ns == CPUFREQ_ETERNAL)
> + return CPUFREQ_DEFAULT_TRANSITION_LATENCY_NS / NSEC_PER_USEC;
> +
> + return transition_latency_ns / NSEC_PER_USEC;
> +}
> +
> /*
> * The PCC subspace describes the rate at which platform can accept commands
> * on the shared PCC channel (including READs which do not count towards freq
> @@ -330,12 +340,12 @@ static unsigned int cppc_cpufreq_get_tra
> return 10000;
> }
> }
> - return cppc_get_transition_latency(cpu) / NSEC_PER_USEC;
> + return get_transition_latency_from_cppc(cpu);
> }
> #else
> static unsigned int cppc_cpufreq_get_transition_delay_us(unsigned int cpu)
> {
> - return cppc_get_transition_latency(cpu) / NSEC_PER_USEC;
> + return get_transition_latency_from_cppc(cpu);
> }
> #endif
>
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-25 16:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-25 15:42 [PATCH v1 0/4] cpufreq: Fixes and cleanups related to CPUFREQ_ETERNAL Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-09-25 15:44 ` [PATCH v1 1/4] cpufreq: Make drivers using CPUFREQ_ETERNAL specify transition latency Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-09-25 16:37 ` Mario Limonciello
2025-09-26 9:46 ` Jie Zhan
2025-09-25 15:44 ` [PATCH v1 2/4] cpufreq: CPPC: Avoid using CPUFREQ_ETERNAL as transition delay Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-09-25 16:36 ` Mario Limonciello [this message]
2025-09-26 9:41 ` Jie Zhan
2025-09-25 15:46 ` [PATCH v1 3/4] ACPI: CPPC: Replace CPUFREQ_ETERNAL with CPPC-specific symbol Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-09-25 16:35 ` Mario Limonciello
2025-09-25 16:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-09-25 17:23 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] ACPI: CPPC: Do not use CPUFREQ_ETERNAL as an error value Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-09-25 18:33 ` Mario Limonciello (AMD) (kernel.org)
2025-09-26 9:30 ` Jie Zhan
2025-09-26 10:22 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-09-25 15:47 ` [PATCH v1 4/4] cpufreq: Drop unused symbol CPUFREQ_ETERNAL Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-09-25 16:36 ` Mario Limonciello (AMD) (kernel.org)
2025-09-26 9:47 ` Jie Zhan
2025-09-29 7:28 ` [PATCH v1 0/4] cpufreq: Fixes and cleanups related to CPUFREQ_ETERNAL Viresh Kumar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=11e2cb33-05cd-4ef3-86e6-ef57e5f1222f@amd.com \
--to=mario.limonciello@amd.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pierre.gondois@arm.com \
--cc=pprakash@codeaurora.org \
--cc=qyousef@layalina.io \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=shawnguo@kernel.org \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox