public inbox for linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [patch 02/10] acpi: fix FADT parsing
@ 2008-05-01  9:52 akpm
  2008-05-01 17:38 ` Thomas Renninger
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: akpm @ 2008-05-01  9:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: lenb; +Cc: linux-acpi, akpm, jbeulich

From: "Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@novell.com>

The (1.0 inherited) separate length fields in the FADT are byte granular. 
Further, PM1a/b may have distinct lengths and live in distinct address spaces.
 acpi_tb_convert_fadt() should account for all of these conditions.

Apart from these changes I'm puzzled by the fact that, not just for
acpi_gbl_xpm1{a,b}_enable, acpi_hw_low_level_{read,write}() get an explicit
size passed rather than using the size found in the passed GAS.  What happens
on a platform that defines PM1{a,b} wider than 16 bits?  Of course,
acpi_hw_low_level_{read,write}() at present are entirely un-prepared to deal
with sizes other than 8, 16, or 32, not to speak of a non-zero bit_offset or
access_width...

Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com>
Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---

 drivers/acpi/tables/tbfadt.c |   16 +++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff -puN drivers/acpi/tables/tbfadt.c~acpi-fix-fadt-parsing drivers/acpi/tables/tbfadt.c
--- a/drivers/acpi/tables/tbfadt.c~acpi-fix-fadt-parsing
+++ a/drivers/acpi/tables/tbfadt.c
@@ -124,7 +124,7 @@ static struct acpi_fadt_info fadt_info_t
 
 static void inline
 acpi_tb_init_generic_address(struct acpi_generic_address *generic_address,
-			     u8 bit_width, u64 address)
+			     u8 byte_width, u64 address)
 {
 
 	/*
@@ -136,7 +136,7 @@ acpi_tb_init_generic_address(struct acpi
 	/* All other fields are byte-wide */
 
 	generic_address->space_id = ACPI_ADR_SPACE_SYSTEM_IO;
-	generic_address->bit_width = bit_width;
+	generic_address->bit_width = byte_width << 3;
 	generic_address->bit_offset = 0;
 	generic_address->access_width = 0;
 }
@@ -343,9 +343,11 @@ static void acpi_tb_convert_fadt(void)
 	 *
 	 * The PM event blocks are split into two register blocks, first is the
 	 * PM Status Register block, followed immediately by the PM Enable Register
-	 * block. Each is of length (pm1_event_length/2)
+	 * block. Each is of length (xpm1x_event_block.bit_width/2)
 	 */
-	pm1_register_length = (u8) ACPI_DIV_2(acpi_gbl_FADT.pm1_event_length);
+	WARN_ON(ACPI_MOD_16(acpi_gbl_FADT.xpm1a_event_block.bit_width));
+	pm1_register_length = (u8) ACPI_DIV_16(acpi_gbl_FADT
+					       .xpm1a_event_block.bit_width);
 
 	/* The PM1A register block is required */
 
@@ -360,13 +362,17 @@ static void acpi_tb_convert_fadt(void)
 	/* The PM1B register block is optional, ignore if not present */
 
 	if (acpi_gbl_FADT.xpm1b_event_block.address) {
+		WARN_ON(ACPI_MOD_16(acpi_gbl_FADT.xpm1b_event_block.bit_width));
+		pm1_register_length = (u8) ACPI_DIV_16(acpi_gbl_FADT
+						       .xpm1b_event_block
+						       .bit_width);
 		acpi_tb_init_generic_address(&acpi_gbl_xpm1b_enable,
 					     pm1_register_length,
 					     (acpi_gbl_FADT.xpm1b_event_block.
 					      address + pm1_register_length));
 		/* Don't forget to copy space_id of the GAS */
 		acpi_gbl_xpm1b_enable.space_id =
-		    acpi_gbl_FADT.xpm1a_event_block.space_id;
+		    acpi_gbl_FADT.xpm1b_event_block.space_id;
 
 	}
 }
_

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [patch 02/10] acpi: fix FADT parsing
  2008-05-01  9:52 [patch 02/10] acpi: fix FADT parsing akpm
@ 2008-05-01 17:38 ` Thomas Renninger
  2008-05-04  9:16   ` Zhao Yakui
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Renninger @ 2008-05-01 17:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: akpm, Moore, Robert; +Cc: lenb, linux-acpi, jbeulich, Zhao Yakui

I wonder whether this could be the real fix for the ThinkPads where it
helped to read FADT entries through RSDT instead of XSDT?
Could this be related?
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8246

Hmm, I'll post the patch there, they should give it a try...

Bob, do you mind giving this a review and push it into your acpica tree
if it looks ok to you?
This looks like a pretty important fix.

Thanks,

   Thomas

On Thu, 2008-05-01 at 02:52 -0700, akpm@linux-foundation.org wrote:
> From: "Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@novell.com>
> 
> The (1.0 inherited) separate length fields in the FADT are byte granular. 
> Further, PM1a/b may have distinct lengths and live in distinct address spaces.
>  acpi_tb_convert_fadt() should account for all of these conditions.
> 
> Apart from these changes I'm puzzled by the fact that, not just for
> acpi_gbl_xpm1{a,b}_enable, acpi_hw_low_level_{read,write}() get an explicit
> size passed rather than using the size found in the passed GAS.  What happens
> on a platform that defines PM1{a,b} wider than 16 bits?  Of course,
> acpi_hw_low_level_{read,write}() at present are entirely un-prepared to deal
> with sizes other than 8, 16, or 32, not to speak of a non-zero bit_offset or
> access_width...
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com>
> Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> ---
> 
>  drivers/acpi/tables/tbfadt.c |   16 +++++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff -puN drivers/acpi/tables/tbfadt.c~acpi-fix-fadt-parsing drivers/acpi/tables/tbfadt.c
> --- a/drivers/acpi/tables/tbfadt.c~acpi-fix-fadt-parsing
> +++ a/drivers/acpi/tables/tbfadt.c
> @@ -124,7 +124,7 @@ static struct acpi_fadt_info fadt_info_t
>  
>  static void inline
>  acpi_tb_init_generic_address(struct acpi_generic_address *generic_address,
> -			     u8 bit_width, u64 address)
> +			     u8 byte_width, u64 address)
>  {
>  
>  	/*
> @@ -136,7 +136,7 @@ acpi_tb_init_generic_address(struct acpi
>  	/* All other fields are byte-wide */
>  
>  	generic_address->space_id = ACPI_ADR_SPACE_SYSTEM_IO;
> -	generic_address->bit_width = bit_width;
> +	generic_address->bit_width = byte_width << 3;
>  	generic_address->bit_offset = 0;
>  	generic_address->access_width = 0;
>  }
> @@ -343,9 +343,11 @@ static void acpi_tb_convert_fadt(void)
>  	 *
>  	 * The PM event blocks are split into two register blocks, first is the
>  	 * PM Status Register block, followed immediately by the PM Enable Register
> -	 * block. Each is of length (pm1_event_length/2)
> +	 * block. Each is of length (xpm1x_event_block.bit_width/2)
>  	 */
> -	pm1_register_length = (u8) ACPI_DIV_2(acpi_gbl_FADT.pm1_event_length);
> +	WARN_ON(ACPI_MOD_16(acpi_gbl_FADT.xpm1a_event_block.bit_width));
> +	pm1_register_length = (u8) ACPI_DIV_16(acpi_gbl_FADT
> +					       .xpm1a_event_block.bit_width);
>  
>  	/* The PM1A register block is required */
>  
> @@ -360,13 +362,17 @@ static void acpi_tb_convert_fadt(void)
>  	/* The PM1B register block is optional, ignore if not present */
>  
>  	if (acpi_gbl_FADT.xpm1b_event_block.address) {
> +		WARN_ON(ACPI_MOD_16(acpi_gbl_FADT.xpm1b_event_block.bit_width));
> +		pm1_register_length = (u8) ACPI_DIV_16(acpi_gbl_FADT
> +						       .xpm1b_event_block
> +						       .bit_width);
>  		acpi_tb_init_generic_address(&acpi_gbl_xpm1b_enable,
>  					     pm1_register_length,
>  					     (acpi_gbl_FADT.xpm1b_event_block.
>  					      address + pm1_register_length));
>  		/* Don't forget to copy space_id of the GAS */
>  		acpi_gbl_xpm1b_enable.space_id =
> -		    acpi_gbl_FADT.xpm1a_event_block.space_id;
> +		    acpi_gbl_FADT.xpm1b_event_block.space_id;
>  
>  	}
>  }
> _
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [patch 02/10] acpi: fix FADT parsing
@ 2008-05-02 20:31 akpm
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: akpm @ 2008-05-02 20:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: lenb; +Cc: linux-acpi, akpm, jbeulich

From: "Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@novell.com>

The (1.0 inherited) separate length fields in the FADT are byte granular. 
Further, PM1a/b may have distinct lengths and live in distinct address spaces.
 acpi_tb_convert_fadt() should account for all of these conditions.

Apart from these changes I'm puzzled by the fact that, not just for
acpi_gbl_xpm1{a,b}_enable, acpi_hw_low_level_{read,write}() get an explicit
size passed rather than using the size found in the passed GAS.  What happens
on a platform that defines PM1{a,b} wider than 16 bits?  Of course,
acpi_hw_low_level_{read,write}() at present are entirely un-prepared to deal
with sizes other than 8, 16, or 32, not to speak of a non-zero bit_offset or
access_width...

Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com>
Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---

 drivers/acpi/tables/tbfadt.c |   16 +++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff -puN drivers/acpi/tables/tbfadt.c~acpi-fix-fadt-parsing drivers/acpi/tables/tbfadt.c
--- a/drivers/acpi/tables/tbfadt.c~acpi-fix-fadt-parsing
+++ a/drivers/acpi/tables/tbfadt.c
@@ -124,7 +124,7 @@ static struct acpi_fadt_info fadt_info_t
 
 static void inline
 acpi_tb_init_generic_address(struct acpi_generic_address *generic_address,
-			     u8 bit_width, u64 address)
+			     u8 byte_width, u64 address)
 {
 
 	/*
@@ -136,7 +136,7 @@ acpi_tb_init_generic_address(struct acpi
 	/* All other fields are byte-wide */
 
 	generic_address->space_id = ACPI_ADR_SPACE_SYSTEM_IO;
-	generic_address->bit_width = bit_width;
+	generic_address->bit_width = byte_width << 3;
 	generic_address->bit_offset = 0;
 	generic_address->access_width = 0;
 }
@@ -343,9 +343,11 @@ static void acpi_tb_convert_fadt(void)
 	 *
 	 * The PM event blocks are split into two register blocks, first is the
 	 * PM Status Register block, followed immediately by the PM Enable Register
-	 * block. Each is of length (pm1_event_length/2)
+	 * block. Each is of length (xpm1x_event_block.bit_width/2)
 	 */
-	pm1_register_length = (u8) ACPI_DIV_2(acpi_gbl_FADT.pm1_event_length);
+	WARN_ON(ACPI_MOD_16(acpi_gbl_FADT.xpm1a_event_block.bit_width));
+	pm1_register_length = (u8) ACPI_DIV_16(acpi_gbl_FADT
+					       .xpm1a_event_block.bit_width);
 
 	/* The PM1A register block is required */
 
@@ -360,13 +362,17 @@ static void acpi_tb_convert_fadt(void)
 	/* The PM1B register block is optional, ignore if not present */
 
 	if (acpi_gbl_FADT.xpm1b_event_block.address) {
+		WARN_ON(ACPI_MOD_16(acpi_gbl_FADT.xpm1b_event_block.bit_width));
+		pm1_register_length = (u8) ACPI_DIV_16(acpi_gbl_FADT
+						       .xpm1b_event_block
+						       .bit_width);
 		acpi_tb_init_generic_address(&acpi_gbl_xpm1b_enable,
 					     pm1_register_length,
 					     (acpi_gbl_FADT.xpm1b_event_block.
 					      address + pm1_register_length));
 		/* Don't forget to copy space_id of the GAS */
 		acpi_gbl_xpm1b_enable.space_id =
-		    acpi_gbl_FADT.xpm1a_event_block.space_id;
+		    acpi_gbl_FADT.xpm1b_event_block.space_id;
 
 	}
 }
_

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [patch 02/10] acpi: fix FADT parsing
  2008-05-01 17:38 ` Thomas Renninger
@ 2008-05-04  9:16   ` Zhao Yakui
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Zhao Yakui @ 2008-05-04  9:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: trenn; +Cc: akpm, Moore, Robert, lenb, linux-acpi, jbeulich

On Thu, 2008-05-01 at 19:38 +0200, Thomas Renninger wrote:
> I wonder whether this could be the real fix for the ThinkPads where it
> helped to read FADT entries through RSDT instead of XSDT?
> Could this be related?
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8246
> 
> Hmm, I'll post the patch there, they should give it a try...
> 
Although this patch can't fix the issue on the Thinkpads laptop of bug
8246, it fixes the error about the bit_width of generic_address.

> Bob, do you mind giving this a review and push it into your acpica tree
> if it looks ok to you?
> This looks like a pretty important fix.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
>    Thomas
> 
> On Thu, 2008-05-01 at 02:52 -0700, akpm@linux-foundation.org wrote:
> > From: "Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@novell.com>
> > 
> > The (1.0 inherited) separate length fields in the FADT are byte granular. 
> > Further, PM1a/b may have distinct lengths and live in distinct address spaces.
> >  acpi_tb_convert_fadt() should account for all of these conditions.
> > 
> > Apart from these changes I'm puzzled by the fact that, not just for
> > acpi_gbl_xpm1{a,b}_enable, acpi_hw_low_level_{read,write}() get an explicit
> > size passed rather than using the size found in the passed GAS.  What happens
> > on a platform that defines PM1{a,b} wider than 16 bits?  Of course,
> > acpi_hw_low_level_{read,write}() at present are entirely un-prepared to deal
> > with sizes other than 8, 16, or 32, not to speak of a non-zero bit_offset or
> > access_width...
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com>
> > Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> > ---
> > 
> >  drivers/acpi/tables/tbfadt.c |   16 +++++++++++-----
> >  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff -puN drivers/acpi/tables/tbfadt.c~acpi-fix-fadt-parsing drivers/acpi/tables/tbfadt.c
> > --- a/drivers/acpi/tables/tbfadt.c~acpi-fix-fadt-parsing
> > +++ a/drivers/acpi/tables/tbfadt.c
> > @@ -124,7 +124,7 @@ static struct acpi_fadt_info fadt_info_t
> >  
> >  static void inline
> >  acpi_tb_init_generic_address(struct acpi_generic_address *generic_address,
> > -			     u8 bit_width, u64 address)
> > +			     u8 byte_width, u64 address)
> >  {
> >  
> >  	/*
> > @@ -136,7 +136,7 @@ acpi_tb_init_generic_address(struct acpi
> >  	/* All other fields are byte-wide */
> >  
> >  	generic_address->space_id = ACPI_ADR_SPACE_SYSTEM_IO;
> > -	generic_address->bit_width = bit_width;
> > +	generic_address->bit_width = byte_width << 3;
> >  	generic_address->bit_offset = 0;
> >  	generic_address->access_width = 0;
> >  }
> > @@ -343,9 +343,11 @@ static void acpi_tb_convert_fadt(void)
> >  	 *
> >  	 * The PM event blocks are split into two register blocks, first is the
> >  	 * PM Status Register block, followed immediately by the PM Enable Register
> > -	 * block. Each is of length (pm1_event_length/2)
> > +	 * block. Each is of length (xpm1x_event_block.bit_width/2)
> >  	 */
> > -	pm1_register_length = (u8) ACPI_DIV_2(acpi_gbl_FADT.pm1_event_length);
> > +	WARN_ON(ACPI_MOD_16(acpi_gbl_FADT.xpm1a_event_block.bit_width));
> > +	pm1_register_length = (u8) ACPI_DIV_16(acpi_gbl_FADT
> > +					       .xpm1a_event_block.bit_width);
> >  
> >  	/* The PM1A register block is required */
> >  
> > @@ -360,13 +362,17 @@ static void acpi_tb_convert_fadt(void)
> >  	/* The PM1B register block is optional, ignore if not present */
> >  
> >  	if (acpi_gbl_FADT.xpm1b_event_block.address) {
> > +		WARN_ON(ACPI_MOD_16(acpi_gbl_FADT.xpm1b_event_block.bit_width));
> > +		pm1_register_length = (u8) ACPI_DIV_16(acpi_gbl_FADT
> > +						       .xpm1b_event_block
> > +						       .bit_width);
> >  		acpi_tb_init_generic_address(&acpi_gbl_xpm1b_enable,
> >  					     pm1_register_length,
> >  					     (acpi_gbl_FADT.xpm1b_event_block.
> >  					      address + pm1_register_length));
> >  		/* Don't forget to copy space_id of the GAS */
> >  		acpi_gbl_xpm1b_enable.space_id =
> > -		    acpi_gbl_FADT.xpm1a_event_block.space_id;
> > +		    acpi_gbl_FADT.xpm1b_event_block.space_id;
> >  
> >  	}
> >  }
> > _
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> > More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2008-05-04  1:25 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-05-01  9:52 [patch 02/10] acpi: fix FADT parsing akpm
2008-05-01 17:38 ` Thomas Renninger
2008-05-04  9:16   ` Zhao Yakui
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-05-02 20:31 akpm

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox