From: Zhao Yakui <yakui.zhao@intel.com>
To: Holger Schurig <hs4233@mail.mn-solutions.de>
Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: OOPS: getting an ACPI interrupt while in an ACPI interrupt hangs my box
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2008 09:01:30 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1221008490.3989.102.camel@yakui_zhao.sh.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200809091605.07734.hs4233@mail.mn-solutions.de>
On Tue, 2008-09-09 at 16:05 +0200, Holger Schurig wrote:
> I just got this OOPS:
If the system is booted with the boot option of
"processor.max_cstate=1", does the following warning message still
exist?
Of course you can open a new bug in bugzilla and attach the output of
dmesg, acpidump, lspci -vxxx.
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=ACPI
thanks.
>
> irq 9: nobody cared (try booting with the "irqpoll" option)
> Pid: 0, comm: swapper Tainted: P 2.6.26.3 #3
> [<c012f063>] __report_bad_irq+0x24/0x69
> [<c012f06a>] __report_bad_irq+0x2b/0x69
> [<c012f257>] note_interrupt+0x1af/0x1e4
> [<c01cbc97>] acpi_irq+0xb/0x1c
> [<c012e983>] handle_IRQ_event+0x1a/0x3f
> [<c012f917>] handle_level_irq+0x63/0x84
> [<c01046d0>] do_IRQ+0x4b/0x60
> [<c010320f>] common_interrupt+0x23/0x28
> [<c01d007b>] acpi_ds_create_operands+0x1c/0xf9
> [<c0118f03>] __do_softirq+0x2c/0x75
> [<c0118f6e>] do_softirq+0x22/0x26
> [<c01191ea>] irq_exit+0x25/0x53
> [<c01046d5>] do_IRQ+0x50/0x60
> [<c010320f>] common_interrupt+0x23/0x28
> [<c01ef3c0>] acpi_idle_enter_simple+0x16d/0x1d9
> [<c025bdba>] cpuidle_idle_call+0x49/0x77
> [<c025bd71>] cpuidle_idle_call+0x0/0x77
> [<c010176c>] cpu_idle+0x48/0x61
> =======================
> handlers:
> [<c01cbc8c>] (acpi_irq+0x0/0x1c)
> Disabling IRQ #9
> BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 138s! [syslogd:1952]
>
> If I read that OOPS right, then I got an interrupt
> ("common_interrupt"), which made the kernel run the ACPI
> function "acpi_ds_create_operands" and while this executed, I've
> got another interupt, which killed my for for 138 seconds ...
>
> Shouldn't there some sort of protection about this or is the DSDT
> of my device just bogus?
>
>
>
>
> Kernel 2.6.26.3
>
> CPU: "Geode(TM) Integrated Processor by AMD PCS"
>
> How to reproduce: press ACPI buttons repeatedly
>
> ACPI related kernel-commandline entries: "pci=noacpi
> acpi_serialize". The first is vital (no boot without), the
> second one is an experiment, I got OOPSes without that, too.
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-09-10 0:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-09-09 14:05 OOPS: getting an ACPI interrupt while in an ACPI interrupt hangs my box Holger Schurig
2008-09-10 1:01 ` Zhao Yakui [this message]
2008-09-10 14:47 ` Holger Schurig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1221008490.3989.102.camel@yakui_zhao.sh.intel.com \
--to=yakui.zhao@intel.com \
--cc=hs4233@mail.mn-solutions.de \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox