public inbox for linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Myron Stowe <myron.stowe@hp.com>
To: lenb@kernel.org
Cc: aystarik@gmail.com, linux-acpi <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] ACPI: Behave uniquely based on processor declaration definition type
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 13:13:46 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1224702826.6784.18.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1224702636.6784.13.camel@localhost>


Associating a Local SAPIC with a processor object is dependent upon the
processor object's definition type.  CPUs declared as "Processor" should use
the Local SAPIC's 'processor_id', and CPUs declared as "Device" should use the
'uid' (see section 5.2.11.13 - Local SAPIC Structure; "Advanced Configuration
and Power Interface Specification", Revision 3.0b).  

This patch changes the lsapic mapping logic to rely on the distinction of
how the processor object was declared - the mapping can't just try both types
of matches irregardless of declaration type and rely on one failing as is
currently being done.

Signed-off-by: Myron Stowe <myron.stowe@hp.com>
CC: Alexey Starikovskiy <aystarik@gmail.com>

---
 drivers/acpi/processor_core.c |   64 +++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)

Index: linux-2.6/drivers/acpi/processor_core.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/acpi/processor_core.c	2008-10-21 13:12:13.000000000 -0600
+++ linux-2.6/drivers/acpi/processor_core.c	2008-10-22 12:12:11.000000000 -0600
@@ -410,7 +410,7 @@ static int acpi_processor_remove_fs(stru
 /* Use the acpiid in MADT to map cpus in case of SMP */
 
 #ifndef CONFIG_SMP
-static int get_cpu_id(acpi_handle handle, u32 acpi_id) {return -1;}
+static int get_cpu_id(acpi_handle handle, int type, u32 acpi_id) { return -1; }
 #else
 
 static struct acpi_table_madt *madt;
@@ -429,27 +429,33 @@ static int map_lapic_id(struct acpi_subt
 }
 
 static int map_lsapic_id(struct acpi_subtable_header *entry,
-		  u32 acpi_id, int *apic_id)
+		int device_declaration, u32 acpi_id, int *apic_id)
 {
 	struct acpi_madt_local_sapic *lsapic =
 		(struct acpi_madt_local_sapic *)entry;
+	u32 tmp = (lsapic->id << 8) | lsapic->eid;
+
 	/* Only check enabled APICs*/
-	if (lsapic->lapic_flags & ACPI_MADT_ENABLED) {
-		/* First check against id */
-		if (lsapic->processor_id == acpi_id) {
-			*apic_id = (lsapic->id << 8) | lsapic->eid;
-			return 1;
-		/* Check against optional uid */
-		} else if (entry->length >= 16 &&
-			lsapic->uid == acpi_id) {
-			*apic_id = lsapic->uid;
-			return 1;
-		}
-	}
+	if (!(lsapic->lapic_flags & ACPI_MADT_ENABLED))
+		return 0;
+
+	/* Device statement declaration type */
+	if (device_declaration) {
+		if (entry->length < 16)
+			printk(KERN_ERR PREFIX "Invalid Local SAPIC structure corresponding to Device statement processor with SAPIC ID %#x\n", tmp);
+		else if (lsapic->uid == acpi_id)
+			goto found;
+	/* Processor statement declaration type */
+	} else if (lsapic->processor_id == acpi_id)
+		goto found;
+
 	return 0;
+found:
+	*apic_id = tmp;
+	return 1;
 }
 
-static int map_madt_entry(u32 acpi_id)
+static int map_madt_entry(int type, u32 acpi_id)
 {
 	unsigned long madt_end, entry;
 	int apic_id = -1;
@@ -470,7 +476,7 @@ static int map_madt_entry(u32 acpi_id)
 			if (map_lapic_id(header, acpi_id, &apic_id))
 				break;
 		} else if (header->type == ACPI_MADT_TYPE_LOCAL_SAPIC) {
-			if (map_lsapic_id(header, acpi_id, &apic_id))
+			if (map_lsapic_id(header, type, acpi_id, &apic_id))
 				break;
 		}
 		entry += header->length;
@@ -478,7 +484,7 @@ static int map_madt_entry(u32 acpi_id)
 	return apic_id;
 }
 
-static int map_mat_entry(acpi_handle handle, u32 acpi_id)
+static int map_mat_entry(acpi_handle handle, int type, u32 acpi_id)
 {
 	struct acpi_buffer buffer = { ACPI_ALLOCATE_BUFFER, NULL };
 	union acpi_object *obj;
@@ -501,7 +507,7 @@ static int map_mat_entry(acpi_handle han
 	if (header->type == ACPI_MADT_TYPE_LOCAL_APIC) {
 		map_lapic_id(header, acpi_id, &apic_id);
 	} else if (header->type == ACPI_MADT_TYPE_LOCAL_SAPIC) {
-		map_lsapic_id(header, acpi_id, &apic_id);
+		map_lsapic_id(header, type, acpi_id, &apic_id);
 	}
 
 exit:
@@ -510,14 +516,14 @@ exit:
 	return apic_id;
 }
 
-static int get_cpu_id(acpi_handle handle, u32 acpi_id)
+static int get_cpu_id(acpi_handle handle, int type, u32 acpi_id)
 {
 	int i;
 	int apic_id = -1;
 
-	apic_id = map_mat_entry(handle, acpi_id);
+	apic_id = map_mat_entry(handle, type, acpi_id);
 	if (apic_id == -1)
-		apic_id = map_madt_entry(acpi_id);
+		apic_id = map_madt_entry(type, acpi_id);
 	if (apic_id == -1)
 		return apic_id;
 
@@ -533,15 +539,16 @@ static int get_cpu_id(acpi_handle handle
                                  Driver Interface
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------- */
 
-static int acpi_processor_get_info(struct acpi_processor *pr, unsigned has_uid)
+static int acpi_processor_get_info(struct acpi_device *device)
 {
 	acpi_status status = 0;
 	union acpi_object object = { 0 };
 	struct acpi_buffer buffer = { sizeof(union acpi_object), &object };
-	int cpu_index;
+	struct acpi_processor *pr;
+	int cpu_index, device_declaration = 0;
 	static int cpu0_initialized;
 
-
+	pr = acpi_driver_data(device);
 	if (!pr)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
@@ -562,8 +569,8 @@ static int acpi_processor_get_info(struc
 		ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT((ACPI_DB_INFO,
 				  "No bus mastering arbitration control\n"));
 
-	/* Check if it is a Device with HID and UID */
-	if (has_uid) {
+	/* Check if it is a Device statement declaration with HID and UID */
+	if (!strcmp(acpi_device_hid(device), ACPI_PROCESSOR_HID)) {
 		unsigned long value;
 		status = acpi_evaluate_integer(pr->handle, METHOD_NAME__UID,
 						NULL, &value);
@@ -571,6 +578,7 @@ static int acpi_processor_get_info(struc
 			printk(KERN_ERR PREFIX "Evaluating processor _UID\n");
 			return -ENODEV;
 		}
+		device_declaration = 1;
 		pr->acpi_id = value;
 	} else {
 		/*
@@ -590,7 +598,7 @@ static int acpi_processor_get_info(struc
 		*/
 		pr->acpi_id = object.processor.proc_id;
 	}
-	cpu_index = get_cpu_id(pr->handle, pr->acpi_id);
+	cpu_index = get_cpu_id(pr->handle, device_declaration, pr->acpi_id);
 
 	/* Handle UP system running SMP kernel, with no LAPIC in MADT */
 	if (!cpu0_initialized && (cpu_index == -1) &&
@@ -662,7 +670,7 @@ static int __cpuinit acpi_processor_star
 
 	pr = acpi_driver_data(device);
 
-	result = acpi_processor_get_info(pr, device->flags.unique_id);
+	result = acpi_processor_get_info(device);
 	if (result) {
 		/* Processor is physically not present */
 		return 0;



  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-10-22 19:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-10-22 19:10 [PATCH 0/3] ACPI: Fix for supporting > 256 processor declaration limit Myron Stowe
2008-10-22 19:12 ` [PATCH 1/3] ACPI: Disambiguate processor declaration type Myron Stowe
2008-10-24  1:16   ` Zhao Yakui
2008-10-24  3:07     ` Myron Stowe
2008-10-24  5:36       ` Zhao Yakui
2008-10-24 16:41         ` Myron Stowe
2008-10-24 21:23         ` Myron Stowe
2008-10-27  7:42           ` Zhao Yakui
2008-10-27 16:07             ` Bjorn Helgaas
2008-10-22 19:13 ` Myron Stowe [this message]
2008-10-24 15:56   ` [PATCH 2/3] ACPI: Behave uniquely based on processor declaration John Keller
2008-10-24 17:11     ` Myron Stowe
2008-10-24 18:42       ` [PATCH 2/3] ACPI: Behave uniquely based on processor John Keller
2008-10-24 20:05         ` Myron Stowe
2008-10-27 15:49           ` John Keller
2008-10-22 19:14 ` [PATCH 3/3] ACPI: 80 column adherence and spelling fix (no functional change) Myron Stowe
2008-10-23  5:34 ` [PATCH 0/3] ACPI: Fix for supporting > 256 processor declaration limit Alexey Starikovskiy
2008-10-23 15:48   ` Myron Stowe
2008-10-23  9:32 ` Zhao Yakui
2008-10-23 16:11   ` Myron Stowe
2008-10-24  2:59     ` Zhao Yakui
2008-10-24  4:42       ` Alexey Starikovskiy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1224702826.6784.18.camel@localhost \
    --to=myron.stowe@hp.com \
    --cc=aystarik@gmail.com \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox