From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Zhang Rui Subject: Re: ACPI crash on lid close - SMP race? Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 09:59:38 +0800 Message-ID: <1226368778.15014.73.camel@rzhang-dt> References: <20081110161105.GA2041@srcf.ucam.org> <1226366834.15014.60.camel@rzhang-dt> <20081111013359.GA11364@srcf.ucam.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]:5352 "EHLO mga09.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752330AbYKKCCG (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Nov 2008 21:02:06 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20081111013359.GA11364@srcf.ucam.org> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Matthew Garrett Cc: "linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" On Tue, 2008-11-11 at 09:33 +0800, Matthew Garrett wrote: > On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 09:27:14AM +0800, Zhang Rui wrote: > > well, there is a bug report for this problem: > > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11259 > > I'll give the noirqbalance case a go. > > > and there are some bug reports for a similar problem (system crashes on > > lid close if _DOS=1, but on a UP platform). > > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6001#c49 > > I think the _DOS=1 case is somewhat different. There you'd expect > significantly more system BIOS code to be run, and that's going to stand > a much higher chance of causing unfortunate interactions with however > Linux has set up the graphics. > oops. sorry, I mean system crashes on lid close if _DOS=0 on some UP platform. thanks, rui