From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Lin Ming Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/8] acpi: avoid using internal acpica structures Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 09:03:26 +0800 Message-ID: <1227747806.16339.13.camel@minggr.sh.intel.com> References: <1227668177.7702.99.camel@minggr.sh.intel.com> <492D0504.8010301@gmail.com> <1227692693.16339.8.camel@minggr.sh.intel.com> <492D2587.9070408@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mga14.intel.com ([143.182.124.37]:56033 "EHLO mga14.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755659AbYK0BJO (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Nov 2008 20:09:14 -0500 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Alexey Starikovskiy Cc: Len Brown , "Moore, Robert" , linux-acpi > Merge the above two lines? > > > > + > > + if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status)) { > > + if (sscanf(node_name, "_Q%x", &value) == 1) { > > > > single if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status) && sscanf(node_name, "_Q%x", &value) == 1) ? OK, that makes code compact. Thanks, Lin Ming