From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] ACPI 5 support for GPIO, SPI and I2C Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2012 11:03:26 +0100 Message-ID: <12328820.crXDTeuliY@vostro.rjw.lan> References: <1353407384-26880-1-git-send-email-mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> <79636467.nuLQX2FqW5@vostro.rjw.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Linus Walleij , Grant Likely Cc: w.sang@pengutronix.de, Mika Westerberg , rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lenb@kernel.org, broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com, khali@linux-fr.org, ben-linux@fluff.org, bhelgaas@google.com, mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Thursday, November 22, 2012 10:43:28 AM Linus Walleij wrote: > On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 10:31 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > This patchset has been around for quite a while and went through a few > > iterations, so I think it's as good as it gets at this point. > > > > I wonder if the GPIO / SPI / I2C maintainers have any objections against it or > > would like the patches to be modified somehow? > > > > If not, then I'd like to take it for v3.8 into the linux-pm.git tree, because > > the patches depend on some changes already in that tree. Hopefully, that's OK. > > For GPIO I want Grant to ACK this. > > He has experience with both Device Tree and GPIO, knows what ACPI and > UEFI is and is way better suited than me to give feedback on this kind of > stuff. > > So from my stance it's "neutral, whatever Grant says goes". OK, we're waiting for a word from Grant, then. :-) Thanks, Rafael -- I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.