Re: [PATCH 3/8] acpi-cpufreq: First multiply then divide to avoid zero results

["Pallipadi, Venkatesh" <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>]

Why is this needed? Normal C precedence rules should take care of this.
No?

Thanks,
Venki 

On Fri, 2009-04-17 at 07:22 -0700, Thomas Renninger wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de>
> Cc: <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>
> Cc: "Pallipadi, Venkatesh" <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
> Cc: <cpufreq@vger.kernel.org>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c |    2 +-
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
> index 4475523..7948d88 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
> @@ -340,7 +340,7 @@ static unsigned int get_measured_perf(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
>  
>  #endif
>  
> -	retval = per_cpu(drv_data, policy->cpu)->max_freq * perf_percent / 100;
> +	retval = (per_cpu(drv_data, policy->cpu)->max_freq * perf_percent) / 100;
>  
>  	return retval;
>  }