From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Maxim Levitsky Subject: Re: [RFC] ACPI battery driver: odd usage of generic power supply class on battery removal Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 03:31:49 +0300 Message-ID: <1242001909.19932.3.camel@maxim-laptop> References: <4A07159A.9010006@tuffmail.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail-bw0-f174.google.com ([209.85.218.174]:43815 "EHLO mail-bw0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753810AbZEKAbz (ORCPT ); Sun, 10 May 2009 20:31:55 -0400 Received: by bwz22 with SMTP id 22so2342062bwz.37 for ; Sun, 10 May 2009 17:31:55 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4A07159A.9010006@tuffmail.co.uk> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Alan Jenkins Cc: Alexey Starikovskiy , linux acpi I also agree with that. For example what would happen if I remove the battery, and then boot the laptop? In this case nobody could know my system has a battery. Currently that makes gpm to hide 'battery' tab. Best regards, Maxim Levitsky