From: yakui_zhao <yakui.zhao@intel.com>
To: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>,
"lenb@kernel.org" <lenb@kernel.org>,
"linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH]: ACPI: Skip the power state check in power transition
Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 09:47:39 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1242265659.3773.428.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090513130803.GA27522@srcf.ucam.org>
On Wed, 2009-05-13 at 21:08 +0800, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> The default behaviour should be to be compatible with Windows,
> regardless of what the spec says. There's an argument for providing a
> strict interpretation of the spec for testing purposes, but I don't
> see
> any reason for it to be split up into dozens of individual kernel
> parameters
The ACPI 1.0 spec is followed by windows XP. And the power state is not
checked in power transition under windows XP.
But we don't know whether it is still skipped on the new version
windows.(For example: Windows 7).
If the module param is removed, we must delete the source code related
with power state check. And if the power state is checked in power
transition on windows 7, what we should do? It is not reasonable to add
them again.
Maybe it is better to determine whether the power state check is skipped
in power transition.
Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-05-14 1:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-05-12 5:27 [PATCH]: ACPI: Skip the power state check in power transition yakui_zhao
2009-05-12 14:57 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2009-05-13 3:13 ` yakui_zhao
2009-05-13 13:08 ` Matthew Garrett
2009-05-14 1:47 ` yakui_zhao [this message]
2009-05-14 10:56 ` Matthew Garrett
2009-05-14 18:49 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2009-05-18 2:08 ` yakui_zhao
2009-05-18 7:13 ` Matthew Garrett
2009-05-21 23:28 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2009-05-28 1:43 ` Len Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1242265659.3773.428.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=yakui.zhao@intel.com \
--cc=bjorn.helgaas@hp.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mjg59@srcf.ucam.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox