public inbox for linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Cc: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
	"menage@google.com" <menage@google.com>,
	Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH]cpuset: add new API to change cpuset top group's cpus
Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 00:36:41 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1242772601.26820.527.camel@twins> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0905191429440.29241@localhost.localdomain>

On Tue, 2009-05-19 at 15:01 -0400, Len Brown wrote:
> > ... the point is, we
> > don't need a new interface to force a cpu idle. Hotplug does that.
> >
> > Furthermore, we should not want anything outside of that, either the cpu
> > is there available for work, or its not -- halfway measures don't make
> > sense.
> > 
> > Furthermore, we already have power aware scheduling which tries to
> > aggregate idle time on cpu/core/packages so as to maximize the idle time
> > power savings. Use it there.
> 
> Some context...

<snip default story of thermal overcommit>

> > > > Besides, a hot removed cpu will do a dead loop halt, which isn't power saving
> > > > efficient. To make hot removed cpu enters deep C-state is in whish list for a
> > > > long time, but still not available. The acpi_processor_idle is a module, and
> > > > cpuidle governor potentially can't handle offline cpu.
> > > 
> > > Then fix that hot-unplug idle loop. I agree that the hlt thing is silly,
> > > and I've no idea why its still there, seems like a much better candidate
> > > for your efforts than this.
> 
> CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU has been problematic in the past.
> It does more than what we need here, so we thought
> a lighter-weight and lower-latency method that simply
> didn't schedule to the idled cpu would suffice.

> We are fixing the hotplug-unplug idle loop, but there
> turns out to be some issues with it related to idle
> processors with interrupts disabled that don't actually
> get down into the deep C-states we request:-(
> 
> So this is why you see a patch for a "halfway measure",
> it does what is necessary, and does nothing more.

Its broken, its ill-defined and its not going to happen.

Ripping cpus out of the top cpuset might upset the cpuset configuration
and has no regards for any realtime processes. And I must take back my
earlier suggestion, hotplug is a bad solution too.

There's just too much user policy (cpuset configuration) to upset.

The IBM folks are working on a scheduler based solution, please talk to
them.



  reply	other threads:[~2009-05-19 22:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-05-19  7:39 [PATCH]cpuset: add new API to change cpuset top group's cpus Shaohua Li
2009-05-19  8:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-05-19  8:48   ` Shaohua Li
2009-05-19  8:56     ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-05-19  9:06       ` Shaohua Li
2009-05-19  9:31         ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-05-19 10:38       ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-05-19 13:37         ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2009-05-28  2:34           ` Len Brown
2009-05-28  7:44             ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2009-05-19 19:01         ` Len Brown
2009-05-19 22:36           ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2009-05-20 11:58             ` Andi Kleen
2009-05-20 12:17               ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-05-20 13:13                 ` Andi Kleen
2009-05-20 13:41                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-05-20 14:45                     ` Andi Kleen
2009-05-20 17:36                     ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2009-05-21  1:22                       ` Shaohua Li
2009-05-21  3:20                         ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2009-05-20 17:21           ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2009-05-19 11:27   ` Andi Kleen
2009-05-19 12:01     ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-05-19 19:55 ` Paul Menage

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1242772601.26820.527.camel@twins \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=menage@google.com \
    --cc=shaohua.li@intel.com \
    --cc=svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox