From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>, Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
"menage@google.com" <menage@google.com>,
Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH]cpuset: add new API to change cpuset top group's cpus
Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 14:17:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1242821825.26820.583.camel@twins> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87ljosnfzb.fsf@basil.nowhere.org>
On Wed, 2009-05-20 at 13:58 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> Could you explain that please? How does changing the top level
> cpuset affect other cpu sets?
Suppose you have 8 cpus and created 3 cpusets:
A: cpu0 - system administration stuff
B: cpu1-5 - generic computational stuff
C: cpu6-7 - latency critical stuff
Each such set is made a load-balance domain (iow load-balancing on the
top level set is disabled).
Now, suppose someone thinks its a good idea to remove cpu0 because the
machine is running against some thermal limit -- what will all the
administration stuff (including sshd) do?
Same goes for the latency critical stuff.
You really want to start shrinking the generic computational capacity
first.
The thing is, you cannot simply rip cpus out from under a system, people
might rely on them being there and have policy attached to them -- esp.
people touching cpusets should know that a machine isn't configured
homogeneous and any odd cpu will do.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-05-20 12:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-05-19 7:39 [PATCH]cpuset: add new API to change cpuset top group's cpus Shaohua Li
2009-05-19 8:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-05-19 8:48 ` Shaohua Li
2009-05-19 8:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-05-19 9:06 ` Shaohua Li
2009-05-19 9:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-05-19 10:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-05-19 13:37 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2009-05-28 2:34 ` Len Brown
2009-05-28 7:44 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2009-05-19 19:01 ` Len Brown
2009-05-19 22:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-05-20 11:58 ` Andi Kleen
2009-05-20 12:17 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2009-05-20 13:13 ` Andi Kleen
2009-05-20 13:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-05-20 14:45 ` Andi Kleen
2009-05-20 17:36 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2009-05-21 1:22 ` Shaohua Li
2009-05-21 3:20 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2009-05-20 17:21 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2009-05-19 11:27 ` Andi Kleen
2009-05-19 12:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-05-19 19:55 ` Paul Menage
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1242821825.26820.583.camel@twins \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=menage@google.com \
--cc=shaohua.li@intel.com \
--cc=svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox