From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tony Vroon Subject: Re: why do drivers evaluate _INI? Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 01:01:15 +0100 Message-ID: <1245715275.441.13.camel@localhost> References: <200906221732.35993.bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-HQeazKLaO6sBOhrb1eHr" Return-path: Received: from gold.linx.net ([195.66.232.40]:39187 "EHLO gold.linx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751955AbZFWAKi (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Jun 2009 20:10:38 -0400 In-Reply-To: <200906221732.35993.bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Bjorn Helgaas Cc: Len Brown , Eric Piel , Pavel Machek , Jonathan Woithe , Mattia Dongili , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org --=-HQeazKLaO6sBOhrb1eHr Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 2009-06-22 at 17:32 -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > I see the following drivers using _INI: > drivers/platform/x86/fujitsu-laptop.c Bjorn, can you send me an experimental patch where you remove it? I can regression test that for you on the Lifebook S6420. I'm happy to sign off on it if I see no functional regressions, and if not at least we'll have an idea of what to look for. Regards, Tony V. --=-HQeazKLaO6sBOhrb1eHr Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAkpAG0sACgkQp5vW4rUFj5rEgQCeIM51beJ8h566pdfV9/k8vu3s X+gAn1t/30tpP8SzDfDTeF+l/h/T8Sm6 =7z58 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-HQeazKLaO6sBOhrb1eHr--