From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: [PATCH]new ACPI processor driver to force CPUs idle Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2009 10:26:20 +0200 Message-ID: <1246955180.8143.112.camel@twins> References: <20090624041354.GA15936@sli10-desk.sh.intel.com> <1245825558.19816.1861.camel@twins> <20090624074703.GA28458@sli10-desk.sh.intel.com> <1245830585.31755.11.camel@twins> <1246002370.31755.187.camel@twins> <20090630080229.GA23296@sli10-desk.sh.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from viefep16-int.chello.at ([62.179.121.36]:60268 "EHLO viefep16-int.chello.at" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754808AbZGGI2I (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Jul 2009 04:28:08 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20090630080229.GA23296@sli10-desk.sh.intel.com> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Shaohua Li Cc: Len Brown , "linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" , "svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com" , "tglx@linutronix.de" , "Pallipadi, Venkatesh" , "andi@firstfloor.org" , Ingo Molnar On Tue, 2009-06-30 at 16:02 +0800, Shaohua Li wrote: > Peter/Len, > is it ok to push the driver to 2.6.31? It's driver specific and > should not impact others. I still think this is utterly the wrong thing to do, therefore I will not ack this.