Re: [Patch] CPUFREQ: Add the suspend/resume flag to avoid smp_call in cpufreq_suspend/resume

[ykzhao <yakui.zhao@intel.com>]

On Fri, 2009-07-24 at 09:49 +0800, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 09:37:43AM +0800, ykzhao wrote:
>  > Subject: [CPUFREQ]: Add the suspend/resume flag to avoid smp_call in cpufreq_suspend/resume 
>  > From: Zhao Yakui <yakui.zhao@intel.com>
>  > 
>  > Only CPU0 is available in course of cpufreq_suspend/resume.
>  > So it is unnecessary to do the smp_call for getting the current
>  > cpufreq.
>  > 
>  > Add a flag of suspend/resume to avoid the smp_call in course of
>  > cpufreq_suspend/resume.
>  > 
>  > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13781
>  > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13269
>  > 
>  > Signed-off-by: Zhao Yakui <yakui.zhao@intel.com>
>  > Tested-by: Christian Casteyde<casteyde.christian@free.fr>
> 
> All this goes away if we just made that suspend/resume code
> conditional on powerpc as previously discussed.
Do you mean that this issue exists on powerpc platform?
How to resolve this issue on the Powerpc according to the discussion?
Where can I get the patch?
thanks.
> 
> We don't need any of it on x86 afaict
> 
> 	Dave