From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Zhang Rui Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/7] PM: Asynchronous suspend and resume (updated) Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 09:59:22 +0800 Message-ID: <1250560762.5351.44.camel@rzhang-dt> References: <200908122218.13975.rjw@sisk.pl> <200908170215.21173.rjw@sisk.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mga01.intel.com ([192.55.52.88]:28289 "EHLO mga01.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751996AbZHRCAz (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Aug 2009 22:00:55 -0400 In-Reply-To: <200908170215.21173.rjw@sisk.pl> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: linux-pm , linux-acpi , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Len Brown , Alan Stern , Arjan van de Ven , Greg KH hmm, what are these patches based on? I tried an 2.6.31-rc6 kernel together with your run-time PM patch (rev. 17) but still failed. thanks, rui On Mon, 2009-08-17 at 08:15 +0800, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Wednesday 12 August 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > Hi, > > > > The following patches introduce a mechanism allowing us to execute device > > drivers' suspend and resume callbacks asynchronously during system sleep > > transitions, such as suspend to RAM. The idea is explained in the [1/1] patch > > message. > > Changes: > > * Added [1/7] that fixes kerneldoc comments in drivers/base/power/main.c > (this is a 2.6.32 candidate). > > * Added [2/7] adding a framework for representing PM link (idea described > in the patch message). > > * [3/7] is the async resume patch (idea described in the patch message). > > * [4/7] is the async suspend patch. > > * [5/7] - [7/7] set async_suspend for devices in a few selected subsystems. > > The patches have been tested on HP nx6325. > > Comments welcome. > > Thanks, > Rafael >