public inbox for linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@gmail.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: linux-pm <linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Mairo <rety@poczta.onet.pl>,
	ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
	Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: ACPI locks hardware devices when it doesn't detect vista
Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2009 01:02:30 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1250978550.6402.14.camel@maxim-laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200908222341.06300.rjw@sisk.pl>

On Sat, 2009-08-22 at 23:41 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Saturday 22 August 2009, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > <joke>
> > This should be brought to a Microsoft antitrust case...
> > </joke>
> > 
> > 
> > Today many notebooks ship with a embedded infrared receiver.
> > In Vista there is new subsystem that decodes these signals.
> > (of course it works only with Microsoft Certificated Remotes (TM)...)
> > 
> > The receiver is usually presented to system as a pnp device 
> > (using acpi tables)
> > 
> > It turns out that some bioses actually use the OSI, ACPI feature of the
> > operation system to detect if running inside Vista. If not they disable
> > the infrared receiver.

Just one note. At least I am now sure that OSI("Windows 2006") does
return true by default.

I have tried booting here with acpi_osi="!Windows 2006", and actually
the CIR PNP device disappeared. I guess that _STA that returns zero
causes that.

On his laptop, ENE0100 device doesn't disappear, but still someone
writes zero to LPCB.IOR2 (we checked and found out that it was zero)

Maybe its zero by default, but some 'magic' driver in windows sets it
up, but this is a PCI config register on LPC bridge, (0x88) and I am
almost sure that nobody except bios knows about it.

Windows IR driver doesn't touch it for sure.

So, it could be that _STA is once called before the _SB._INI ?


Best regards,
	Maxim Levitsky

> 
> Oh well.
> 
> That should've been Cced to linux-acpi (now added).  I'm looking forward to
> seeng a comment from Len. 
Sorry....
> 
> > On my system this it is still tolerable:
> > 
> >             Device (MIR)
> >             {
> >                 Name (_HID, EisaId ("ENE0100"))
> >                 Method (_STA, 0, NotSerialized)
> >                 {
> >                     If (LGreaterEqual (OSYS, 0x07D6))
> >                     {
> >                         If (LOr (And (OTHR, 0x02), And (OTHR, 0x40)))
> >                         {
> >                             Return (0x00)
> >                         }
> >                         Else
> >                         {
> >                             Return (0x0F)
> >                         }
> >                     }
> >                     Else
> >                     {
> >                         Return (0x00)
> >                     }
> >                 }
> > 
> > But not so, on Mairo's system:
> > 
> >             Device (MIR)
> >             {
> >                 Name (_HID, EisaId ("ENE0100"))
> >                 Method (_STA, 0, NotSerialized)
> >                 {
> >                     If (LAnd (MCIR, LEqual (OSYS, 0x07D6)))
> >                     {
> >                         Return (0x0F)
> >                     }
> >                     Else
> >                     {
> >                         Store (Zero, ^^LPCB.IOR2)
> >                         Return (Zero)
> >                     }
> >                 }
> > 
> > 	.......
> > 
> >     Method (_WAK, 1, NotSerialized)
> >     {
> >     .......
> >         If (Not (LAnd (MCIR, LEqual (OSYS, 0x07D6))))
> >         {
> >             Store (Zero, \_SB.PCI0.LPCB.IOR2)
> >         }
> > 
> > 
> > .....
> > 
> >     Scope (_SB)
> >     {
> >         Method (_INI, 0, NotSerialized)
> >         {
> >             If (DTSE)
> >             {
> >                 TRAP (0x47)
> >             }
> > 
> >             Store (0x07D0, OSYS)
> >             If (CondRefOf (_OSI, Local0))
> >             {
> >                 If (_OSI ("Linux"))
> >                 {
> >                     Store (One, LINX)
> >                     Store (Zero, ECDY)
> >                 }
> > 
> >                 If (_OSI ("Windows 2001"))
> >                 {
> >                     Store (0x07D1, OSYS)
> >                 }
> > 
> >                 If (_OSI ("Windows 2001 SP1"))
> >                 {
> >                     Store (0x07D1, OSYS)
> >                 }
> > 
> >                 If (_OSI ("Windows 2001 SP2"))
> >                 {
> >                     Store (0x07D2, OSYS)
> >                 }
> > 
> >                 If (_OSI ("Windows 2006"))
> >                 {
> >                     Store (0x07D6, OSYS)
> >                 }
> > 
> >                 If (LEqual (TPMV, One))
> >                 {
> >                     If (LLessEqual (OSYS, 0x07D2))
> >                     {
> >                         TRAP (0x49)
> >                     }
> >                 }
> >             }
> > 
> >             If (LAnd (MPEN, LEqual (OSYS, 0x07D1)))
> >             {
> >                 TRAP (0x3D)
> >             }
> > 
> >             TRAP (0x2B)
> >         }
> >     }
> > 
> > We have tried to boot the system with acpi_osi="Windows 2006", but it
> > didn't help (kernel log confirmed that this parameter was set)
> > 
> > The only explanation I think of is ether his laptop is whitelisted on
> > osi=Linux, or that _SB._INI is called by linux _after_ MIR._STA
> > or that acpi_osi isn't yet in charge when _SB._INI is called.
> > 
> > 
> > The kernel in question is quite recent kernel, (2.6.30.5 from debian
> > unstable).
> > 
> > 
> > The only way I managed to 'enable' this device is to 
> > do 'sudo setpci -s 00:1f.0 0x88.W=0x701'
> > 
> > Or in other words undo the damage done by these ACPI commands.
> > 
> > Mairo, can you boot the system with acpi=off, and then poke the cir IO
> > range (0x700-0x703) ?
> 
> Best,
> Rafael
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


  reply	other threads:[~2009-08-22 22:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1250945310.14167.150.camel@maxim-laptop>
2009-08-22 21:41 ` ACPI locks hardware devices when it doesn't detect vista Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-22 22:02   ` Maxim Levitsky [this message]
2009-08-22 22:36     ` Maxim Levitsky
2009-08-23  0:02       ` Maxim Levitsky
2009-08-24 16:17         ` Maxim Levitsky
2009-08-24 18:47           ` Mario
     [not found] ` <1251503638.17451.14.camel@maxim-laptop>
2009-08-29  0:40   ` Maxim Levitsky
2009-08-29 18:50     ` Maxim Levitsky
2009-08-29 19:40   ` Is acpi_ec_ecdt_probe() broken? (was: Re: ACPI locks hardware devices when it doesn't detect vista) Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-29 19:51     ` Maxim Levitsky
2009-08-29 21:05       ` Mario
2009-08-29 22:37         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-29 23:30           ` Maxim Levitsky
2009-08-30  6:59             ` Mario
2009-08-30 13:20               ` Rafael J. Wysocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1250978550.6402.14.camel@maxim-laptop \
    --to=maximlevitsky@gmail.com \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=rety@poczta.onet.pl \
    --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox