From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Maxim Levitsky Subject: Re: [RESEND] [PATCH 1/3] ACPI: battery: Fix CONFIG_ACPI_SYSFS_POWER=n Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 00:21:11 +0300 Message-ID: <1252531271.4174.5.camel@maxim-laptop> References: <4A4A219C.2020802@tuffmail.co.uk> <1252339562.28499.13.camel@maxim-laptop> <4AA7E438.4070905@tuffmail.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail-fx0-f217.google.com ([209.85.220.217]:57140 "EHLO mail-fx0-f217.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754369AbZIIVVP (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Sep 2009 17:21:15 -0400 Received: by fxm17 with SMTP id 17so3694018fxm.37 for ; Wed, 09 Sep 2009 14:21:18 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4AA7E438.4070905@tuffmail.co.uk> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Alan Jenkins Cc: linux acpi , Alexey Starikovskiy On Wed, 2009-09-09 at 18:22 +0100, Alan Jenkins wrote: > Maxim Levitsky wrote: > > Hi, > > > > So this is newer version of this patchset. > > When this will be merged? > > > > > > Last patch doesn't apply, seems that parts of yours patch were applied. > > I applied it manually. > > > > Will soon test. > > > > > > Best regards, > > Maxim Levitsky > > > > I will submit "To: len" next time round. > > You're right, it no longer applies cleanly to acpi-test. ["patch" is > happy to apply it and warn about "fuzz", but git-am is more strict. It > doesn't look like there's a real conflict.] I applied it on top of both vanilla and linux-next. Here it really doesn't apply (with or without 'fuzz') > > I look forward to your results. Please tell me the diff you end up with > for the last patch and what tree you applied it on top of. That way, if > I add "Tested-by: Maxim..." I can be certain we're talking about the > same patch :-). > > Thanks! > Alan I did that few days ago (applied patch manually, without much thinking) Unfortunately, resulting kernel oopses if battery is present, and otherwise, if I plug batter later on, many battery statistics are missing (probably some locks are held) I will soon investigate this issue, more deeply. Best regards, Maxim Levitsky