From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Richard Purdie Subject: Re: [GIT PATCH] backlight event support enhancements Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 00:41:42 +0100 Message-ID: <1253490102.564.3.camel@ted> References: <1253468688-4933-1-git-send-email-hmh@hmh.eng.br> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from 93-97-173-237.zone5.bethere.co.uk ([93.97.173.237]:54271 "EHLO tim.rpsys.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750984AbZITX7E (ORCPT ); Sun, 20 Sep 2009 19:59:04 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1253468688-4933-1-git-send-email-hmh@hmh.eng.br> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh Cc: Matthew Garrett , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, ibm-acpi-devel@lists.sourceforge.net On Sun, 2009-09-20 at 14:44 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > This two-patch patchset adds poll() support to Matthew's backlight event > work, and also adds backlight event support for thinkpad-acpi. > > The thinkpad-acpi changes depend on a patchset I just sent to Len Brown > for merging in acpi-test. > > Is there any timeframe for the backlight event support to be sent to > mainline? I'm going to try and get the event patches in this merge window if I can. I'm going to have intermittent internet access for a few days but I will send a pull request for the backlight tree over that time period. Whats the timeframe for acpi-test merging? Cheers, Richard -- Richard Purdie Intel Open Source Technology Centre