From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Richard Purdie Subject: Re: [GIT PATCH] backlight event support enhancements Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 00:35:09 +0100 Message-ID: <1254008109.7598.63.camel@ted> References: <1253468688-4933-1-git-send-email-hmh@hmh.eng.br> <1253490102.564.3.camel@ted> <20090921122859.GC1136@khazad-dum.debian.net> <20090926195527.GB15339@khazad-dum.debian.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from dan.rpsys.net ([93.97.175.187]:62674 "EHLO dan.rpsys.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751533AbZIZXfj (ORCPT ); Sat, 26 Sep 2009 19:35:39 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20090926195527.GB15339@khazad-dum.debian.net> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh Cc: Matthew Garrett , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, ibm-acpi-devel@lists.sourceforge.net On Sat, 2009-09-26 at 16:55 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > On Mon, 21 Sep 2009, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > > > I'm going to try and get the event patches in this merge window if I > > > can. I'm going to have intermittent internet access for a few days but I > > > will send a pull request for the backlight tree over that time period. > > > > > > Whats the timeframe for acpi-test merging? > > > > acpi-test usually merges late, and the patchset with the prerequisites for > > patch 2/2 are not even merged in acpi-test yet. > > Well, they got merged early :-) The patches are all in mainline already, so > the thinkpad-acpi dependencies have been taken care of. > > Can you please merge patch 2/2 through the backlight tree? It can go in > toghether with Matthew's patches. Matthew's patches and your 1/2 patch are in. I'll queue 2/2 in the tree now I know the other parts are there. Cheers, Richard -- Richard Purdie Intel Open Source Technology Centre