From: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
To: Stefan Bader <stefan.bader@canonical.com>
Cc: "linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>,
"lenb@kernel.org" <lenb@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Less strict requirements for video device detection (v3)
Date: Fri, 09 Oct 2009 09:30:29 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1255051829.2656.2.camel@rzhang-dt> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4AC3BE3B.7020304@canonical.com>
On Thu, 2009-10-01 at 04:23 +0800, Stefan Bader wrote:
> Resending. It feels like being lost.
>
> -Stefan
>
Hi, len,
can you apply this patch please? thanks.
From: Stefan Bader <stefan.bader@canonical.com>
Subject: [PATCH] acpi: video: Loosen strictness of video bus detection code
BugLink: http://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/333386
Currently a video bus device must (beside other criteria) define _DOD and
_DOS methods to be considered a video device.
Some broken BIOSes prevented working backlight control by only defining both
for one (non-existing bus) and only _DOD for the rest. With this patch in
place the other bus definitions were considered too and backlight control
started to work again.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Bader <stefan.bader@canonical.com>
Acked-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
---
drivers/acpi/video.c | 7 ++++++-
drivers/acpi/video_detect.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/video.c b/drivers/acpi/video.c
index a4fddb2..518910e 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/video.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/video.c
@@ -1109,7 +1109,12 @@ static int acpi_video_bus_check(struct acpi_video_bus *video)
*/
/* Does this device support video switching? */
- if (video->cap._DOS) {
+ if (video->cap._DOS || video->cap._DOD) {
+ if (!video->cap._DOS) {
+ printk(KERN_WARNING FW_BUG
+ "ACPI(%s) defines _DOD but not _DOS\n",
+ acpi_device_bid(video->device));
+ }
video->flags.multihead = 1;
status = 0;
}
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/video_detect.c b/drivers/acpi/video_detect.c
index 7032f25..575593a 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/video_detect.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/video_detect.c
@@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ long acpi_is_video_device(struct acpi_device *device)
return 0;
/* Does this device able to support video switching ? */
- if (ACPI_SUCCESS(acpi_get_handle(device->handle, "_DOD", &h_dummy)) &&
+ if (ACPI_SUCCESS(acpi_get_handle(device->handle, "_DOD", &h_dummy)) ||
ACPI_SUCCESS(acpi_get_handle(device->handle, "_DOS", &h_dummy)))
video_caps |= ACPI_VIDEO_OUTPUT_SWITCHING;
--
1.5.4.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-09 1:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-20 9:14 Less strict requirements for video device detection Stefan Bader
2009-08-21 1:17 ` Zhang Rui
2009-08-21 10:00 ` Less strict requirements for video device detection (v2) Stefan Bader
2009-08-24 1:19 ` Zhang Rui
2009-08-24 14:44 ` Less strict requirements for video device detection (v3) Stefan Bader
2009-08-25 1:08 ` Zhang Rui
2009-09-30 20:23 ` Stefan Bader
2009-10-09 1:30 ` Zhang Rui [this message]
2009-10-13 6:52 ` Len Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1255051829.2656.2.camel@rzhang-dt \
--to=rui.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mjg59@srcf.ucam.org \
--cc=stefan.bader@canonical.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox