From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Huang Ying Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5 -v2] acpi, apei, Document for APEI Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 16:44:55 +0800 Message-ID: <1260780295.12561.118.camel@yhuang-dev.sh.intel.com> References: <1260429424.15264.397.camel@yhuang-dev.sh.intel.com> <200912110958.29319.bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mga11.intel.com ([192.55.52.93]:29378 "EHLO mga11.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753962AbZLNIo6 (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Dec 2009 03:44:58 -0500 In-Reply-To: <200912110958.29319.bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Bjorn Helgaas Cc: "lenb@kernel.org" , ACPI Devel Maling List , Andi Kleen , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" On Sat, 2009-12-12 at 00:58 +0800, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > On Thursday 10 December 2009 12:17:04 am Huang Ying wrote: > > Add document for APEI, including kernel parameters and EINJ debug file > > sytem interface. > > From a stylistic point of view, I think it's better if the > documentation is added by the same patch that adds the functionality. > Having them in separate patches means there's a point in time where > the tree contains the functionality but not the documentation, or > vice versa. Sounds reasonable, I will change this. Best Regards, Huang Ying