From: Jerone Young <jerone.young@canonical.com>
To: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br>
Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix mute key on older Thinkpads by OSI blacklisting them
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 21:19:17 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1272075557.29792.10.camel@laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1272075251.29792.9.camel@laptop>
Errr .. Below I meant an earlier email I did on the thinkpad-acpi
mailing list a while back testing out the mute led support you had.
Thanks,
Jerone
On Fri, 2010-04-23 at 21:14 -0500, Jerone Young wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-04-23 at 23:01 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > On Fri, 23 Apr 2010, Jerone Young wrote:
> > > This patch fixes that mute keys for X & R & W series Thinkpads. For
> > > these Thinkpads in the BIOS if OS exposes itself as "Linux" it will
> > > switch the functionality of the mute key to send a mute key press to the
> > > OS. These machines will not be getting any bios updates in the future.
> >
> > Lenovo is getting really cheap those days if they now kill a BIOS that
> > isn't even two years old.
> Well they just will not have any update that would change the behavior.
> But yeah the BIOS for these are done.
>
> >
> > > All of these Thinkpads do not have a little light that would indicate
> > > the mute is on. So having them send the mute key to the OS makes a
> > > better user experience and also will match behavior of newer Thinkpads.
> > > These all have the same quirk the T400 & T500 have.
> >
> > Depends on how the key behaves. Does the EC change from mute always
> > mutes (and vol up/down unmutes) mode to mute does nothing (and thus you
> > can dumb it down into a toggle) depending on OSI(Linux) ?
>
> Yeap. So by setting OSI=Linux, the EC basically just makes the mute
> button an OS key press. The OS then mutes from the driver or higher
> level. This way both speakers & headphone jack get muted.
>
>
>
> >
> > Also, should I scrap any support for Lenovo mute-only hardware mixers?
> > OSI(Linux) seems to break it badly (but I'd appreciate some extensive
> > testing of this, if you can do it... regular users often can't get
> > userspace to quiet down enough to test it without external influences
> > and I get mixed reports). Bit 6 of EC register 0x30 should control
> > speaker muting.
>
>
> I think scrapping the support would be a good idea. After discovering
> the hardware mute was only wired to the speakers, and not the headphone
> jack. It seems best to let userspace do it, and this at least it is what
> Lenovo is doing for the newer Thinkpads now. But I can also understand
> that by doing this you depend on userspace to quiet down.
>
> Well the T410 has interesting behavior. It actually does both at the
> same time. It sends the OS the mute key press & does a hardware mute to
> the speakers. This can fall out of sync of course if a user mutes from
> the userspace applet. But is easily remedied once the user presses the
> up or down volume key.
>
> Given some of the new behavior it's probably best to crap it. I did some
> testing though before on this on the acpi-devel mailing list with my
> X301. I want to send the OSI patch for that as well. But the X300 & the
> X301 have the nice hardware mute light that some people love. So I will
> just have to add the command line for my machine for a while.
>
> Thanks,
> Jerone
>
>
>
> >
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-04-24 2:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-04-23 22:48 [PATCH] Fix mute key on older Thinkpads by OSI blacklisting them Jerone Young
2010-04-24 2:01 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2010-04-24 2:14 ` Jerone Young
2010-04-24 2:19 ` Jerone Young [this message]
2010-04-24 3:10 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2010-04-24 4:15 ` Jerone Young
2010-04-24 16:01 ` Matthew Garrett
2010-04-24 20:49 ` Jerone Young
2010-04-24 21:16 ` Matthew Garrett
2010-04-25 0:08 ` Jerone Young
2010-04-25 2:28 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2010-04-25 18:28 ` Jerone Young
2010-04-25 18:44 ` Matthew Garrett
2010-04-25 18:57 ` Jerone Young
2010-04-25 18:59 ` Matthew Garrett
2010-04-25 19:19 ` Jerone Young
2010-04-26 10:11 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2010-04-27 5:50 ` Jerone Young
2010-04-25 19:02 ` Jerone Young
2010-04-26 10:38 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2010-04-27 5:44 ` Jerone Young
2010-04-25 0:19 ` Jerone Young
2010-05-03 11:45 ` Andy Lutomirski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1272075557.29792.10.camel@laptop \
--to=jerone.young@canonical.com \
--cc=hmh@hmh.eng.br \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).