linux-acpi.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jerone Young <jerone.young@canonical.com>
To: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br>
Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix mute key on older Thinkpads by OSI blacklisting them
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 00:50:12 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1272347412.14100.18.camel@laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100426101115.GA2614@khazad-dum.debian.net>

On Mon, 2010-04-26 at 07:11 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Sun, 25 Apr 2010, Jerone Young wrote:
> > On Sun, 2010-04-25 at 19:44 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > > On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 01:28:11PM -0500, Jerone Young wrote:
> > > > I think it's not really possible to get it correct with thinkpad-acpi .
> > > > The reason is the userspace sound server. In our case it's pulse audio.
> > > > So we are no longer just dealing with ALSA anymore. So if the OS gets a
> > > > proper hotkey event it is able to mute at the pulse audio level then,
> > > > pulse audio does work at the ALSA level (toggling the mixer).
> > > > thinkpad-acpi has no way to check on the status of pulse audio.
> > > 
> > > This really isn't a problem. We have a mixer device for the Thinkpad's 
> > > own mixer, and we can send ALSA events to indicate that its state has 
> > > changed.
> > 
> > I think it is. Since pulse audio only pay attention to the Master mixer
> > of the primary card. The Thinkpad EC shows up basically as a second
> > audio card. 
> 
> Fix userspace, don't break the kernel.

I think going this route actually is more hacky .. by having a second
sound device for this. My thoughts is all of this should be removed.
Instead have somewhere where hardware mute state can be checked easily.

> 
> It is taking more than two years to fix the last such "shortcut" (brightness
> control keys misused as notifications) taken because of userspace
> shortcomings.
> 
> > I think all this work isn't going to help the situation any. There
> > appears to be a easy solution. Just a matter of getting the LEDs on some
> > to light correctly, and see when the hardware mute is enabled.
> 
> It is a matter of keeping the hardware state and software states in sync.
> 
> Looking at it in any other way will result in gross, fragile hacks.

I agree. I think though that by trying to solve the whole problem at the
thinkpad-acpi level makes it more hacky.

Instead having thinkpad-acpi just exposing the LEDs & hardware mute
state. Then allowing a userspace daemon to see & manipulate these states
is a more elegant solution. This way it can also query & manipulate
higher level things, like sound servers (pulse audio) , and keep
everyone in sync.

				Thanks,
					Jerone


> 



  reply	other threads:[~2010-04-27  5:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-04-23 22:48 [PATCH] Fix mute key on older Thinkpads by OSI blacklisting them Jerone Young
2010-04-24  2:01 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2010-04-24  2:14   ` Jerone Young
2010-04-24  2:19     ` Jerone Young
2010-04-24  3:10     ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2010-04-24  4:15       ` Jerone Young
2010-04-24 16:01 ` Matthew Garrett
2010-04-24 20:49   ` Jerone Young
2010-04-24 21:16     ` Matthew Garrett
2010-04-25  0:08       ` Jerone Young
2010-04-25  2:28         ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2010-04-25 18:28           ` Jerone Young
2010-04-25 18:44             ` Matthew Garrett
2010-04-25 18:57               ` Jerone Young
2010-04-25 18:59                 ` Matthew Garrett
2010-04-25 19:19                   ` Jerone Young
2010-04-26 10:11                 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2010-04-27  5:50                   ` Jerone Young [this message]
2010-04-25 19:02           ` Jerone Young
2010-04-26 10:38             ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2010-04-27  5:44               ` Jerone Young
2010-04-25  0:19       ` Jerone Young
2010-05-03 11:45         ` Andy Lutomirski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1272347412.14100.18.camel@laptop \
    --to=jerone.young@canonical.com \
    --cc=hmh@hmh.eng.br \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mjg59@srcf.ucam.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).