From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Lin Ming Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPICA: Handle large field apertures. Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 15:31:39 +0800 Message-ID: <1274859099.3429.25.camel@minggr.sh.intel.com> References: <4911F71203A09E4D9981D27F9D830858709F2D04@orsmsx503.amr.corp.intel.com> <20100525105910.2629.76253.stgit@thinkpad> <1274841567.28455.16.camel@minggr.sh.intel.com> <1274842158.28455.18.camel@minggr.sh.intel.com> <4BFCCE01.1070100@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from mga01.intel.com ([192.55.52.88]:54202 "EHLO mga01.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751042Ab0EZHc3 (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 May 2010 03:32:29 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4BFCCE01.1070100@suse.de> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Alexey Starikovskiy Cc: "Moore, Robert" , Len Brown , "Linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" On Wed, 2010-05-26 at 15:30 +0800, Alexey Starikovskiy wrote: > Hi Ming, >=20 > 26.05.2010 06:49, Lin Ming =D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=88=D0=B5=D1=82: > > Better to test AccessByteWidth as below, > Why not just 'if (AccessByteWidth > 255)' ? OK, that's more clear. > >=20 > > + if (!(AccessByteWidth & ~0xFF)) { > >=20 >=20 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" i= n the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html