From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Maxim Levitsky Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ACPI: Store NVS state even when entering suspend to RAM Date: Wed, 02 Jun 2010 16:06:55 +0300 Message-ID: <1275484015.11772.2.camel@maxim-laptop> References: <1275078735-1866-1-git-send-email-mjg@redhat.com> <1275078735-1866-2-git-send-email-mjg@redhat.com> <1275230404.14907.11.camel@maxim-laptop> <20100530145142.GA32078@srcf.ucam.org> <20100602033225.GA6511@khazad-dum.debian.net> <20100602114709.GA32247@srcf.ucam.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.157]:59555 "EHLO fg-out-1718.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753545Ab0FBNHG (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Jun 2010 09:07:06 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20100602114709.GA32247@srcf.ucam.org> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Matthew Garrett Cc: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh , lenb@kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 12:47 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote: > On Wed, Jun 02, 2010 at 12:32:25AM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > > On Sun, 30 May 2010, Matthew Garrett wrote: > > > On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 05:40:04PM +0300, Maxim Levitsky wrote: > > > > Just one note, I am sure somebody will ask for s3_no_nvs option, just > > > > like s4_no_nvs. > > > > > > I'd be surprised. Better to add the option when we think it's needed. > > > > Do _all_ Windows versions restore NVS over S3 suspend/resume? > > XP does regardless of whether any OSI strings are presented, and we have > systems that break unless it's done, so I think it's a safe bet. This laptop was shipped with Vista, and since suspend works I guess its highly likely that vista does restore NVS this way too. This only leaves W7. I doubt they would break older systems by fixing a bug.... Best regards, Maxim Levitsky