From: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
To: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Cc: "linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: ACPI error messages
Date: Thu, 03 Jun 2010 09:10:06 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1275527406.9119.8724.camel@rzhang1-desktop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.1006021105590.1992-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>
On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 23:10 +0800, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Jun 2010, Zhang Rui wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 09:32 +0800, Alan Stern wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2 Jun 2010, Zhang Rui wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Tue, 2010-06-01 at 21:11 +0800, Alan Stern wrote:
> > > > > My kernel log is full of hundreds of messages like these:
> > > > >
> > > > > ACPI Exception: AE_AML_BUFFER_LIMIT, Index (000000046) is beyond end of object (20090903/exoparg2-445)
> > > > > ACPI Error (psparse-0537): Method parse/execution failed [\_SB_.PCI0.SBRG.EC0_.STBR] (Node f701c918), AE_AML_BUFFER_LIMIT
> > > > > ACPI Error (psparse-0537): Method parse/execution failed [\_SB_.PCI0.VGA_.LCDD._BCM] (Node f7017b58), AE_AML_BUFFER_LIMIT
> > > > > ACPI Error: Evaluating _BCM failed (20090903/video-528)
> > > > >
> > > > This sounds like a win7 compatibility issue that I've seen before.
> > > > please try boot option acpi_osi="!Windows 2009" and see if it helps.
> > >
> > > Yes, indeed it does! It results in a few other differences too; I
> > > can't tell whether they are good, bad, or neutral.
> > >
> > well, I don't see any other difference except some code execution
> > ordering issue.
>
> You are right. Well, there is one difference: the lines about
> "cfg80211: World regulatory domain updated:". I'm not concerned about
> that.
>
> > I read the acpidump of this laptop, and it also confirms that this (_BCM
> > stuff) is the only place that acpi_osi="!Windows 2009" changes.
>
> All right; I'll keep that boot config option. Is there a plan to fix
> this compatibility issue?
>
This is a BIOS bug to me. The code runs in this way:
if (not Win7)
good BIOS code
else
buggy BIOS code
This is a regression because ACPI declares it's win7 compatible in
2.6.31. I'm afraid we can do nothing in Linux kernel to fix/workaround
it. IMO, we should ping Asus to fix it in their new BIOS release.
thanks,
rui
We can not fix it in kernel.
> Alan Stern
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-06-03 1:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.1006012126370.32192-300000@netrider.rowland.org>
2010-06-02 2:13 ` ACPI error messages Zhang Rui
2010-06-02 15:10 ` Alan Stern
2010-06-03 1:10 ` Zhang Rui [this message]
2010-06-03 1:52 ` Alan Stern
2010-06-03 14:16 ` Matthew Garrett
2010-06-04 1:03 ` Zhang Rui
2010-06-04 14:52 ` Alan Stern
2010-06-07 1:12 ` Zhang Rui
2010-06-08 18:42 ` Alan Stern
2010-06-01 13:11 Alan Stern
2010-06-02 0:59 ` Zhang Rui
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1275527406.9119.8724.camel@rzhang1-desktop \
--to=rui.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox