Linux ACPI
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
To: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Cc: "linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: ACPI error messages
Date: Thu, 03 Jun 2010 09:10:06 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1275527406.9119.8724.camel@rzhang1-desktop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.1006021105590.1992-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>

On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 23:10 +0800, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Jun 2010, Zhang Rui wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 09:32 +0800, Alan Stern wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2 Jun 2010, Zhang Rui wrote:
> > > 
> > > > On Tue, 2010-06-01 at 21:11 +0800, Alan Stern wrote:
> > > > > My kernel log is full of hundreds of messages like these:
> > > > >
> > > > > ACPI Exception: AE_AML_BUFFER_LIMIT, Index (000000046) is beyond end of object (20090903/exoparg2-445)
> > > > > ACPI Error (psparse-0537): Method parse/execution failed [\_SB_.PCI0.SBRG.EC0_.STBR] (Node f701c918), AE_AML_BUFFER_LIMIT
> > > > > ACPI Error (psparse-0537): Method parse/execution failed [\_SB_.PCI0.VGA_.LCDD._BCM] (Node f7017b58), AE_AML_BUFFER_LIMIT
> > > > > ACPI Error: Evaluating _BCM failed (20090903/video-528)
> > > > >
> > > > This sounds like a win7 compatibility issue that I've seen before.
> > > > please try boot option acpi_osi="!Windows 2009" and see if it helps.
> > > 
> > > Yes, indeed it does!  It results in a few other differences too; I
> > > can't tell whether they are good, bad, or neutral.
> > > 
> > well, I don't see any other difference except some code execution
> > ordering issue.
> 
> You are right.  Well, there is one difference: the lines about 
> "cfg80211: World regulatory domain updated:".  I'm not concerned about 
> that.
> 
> > I read the acpidump of this laptop, and it also confirms that this (_BCM
> > stuff) is the only place that acpi_osi="!Windows 2009" changes.
> 
> All right; I'll keep that boot config option.  Is there a plan to fix 
> this compatibility issue?
> 
This is a BIOS bug to me. The code runs in this way:

if (not Win7)
  good BIOS code
else
  buggy BIOS code

This is a regression because ACPI declares it's win7 compatible in
2.6.31. I'm afraid we can do nothing in Linux kernel to fix/workaround
it. IMO, we should ping Asus to fix it in their new BIOS release.

thanks,
rui






 We can not fix it in kernel.

> Alan Stern
> 



  reply	other threads:[~2010-06-03  1:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.1006012126370.32192-300000@netrider.rowland.org>
2010-06-02  2:13 ` ACPI error messages Zhang Rui
2010-06-02 15:10   ` Alan Stern
2010-06-03  1:10     ` Zhang Rui [this message]
2010-06-03  1:52       ` Alan Stern
2010-06-03 14:16       ` Matthew Garrett
2010-06-04  1:03         ` Zhang Rui
2010-06-04 14:52           ` Alan Stern
2010-06-07  1:12             ` Zhang Rui
2010-06-08 18:42               ` Alan Stern
2010-06-01 13:11 Alan Stern
2010-06-02  0:59 ` Zhang Rui

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1275527406.9119.8724.camel@rzhang1-desktop \
    --to=rui.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox