From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Maxim Levitsky Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] suspend: Move NVS save/restore code to generic suspend functionality Date: Sat, 05 Jun 2010 18:28:38 +0300 Message-ID: <1275751718.10792.0.camel@maxim-laptop> References: <1275078735-1866-1-git-send-email-mjg@redhat.com> <1275230238.14907.8.camel@maxim-laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.152]:11265 "EHLO fg-out-1718.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757398Ab0FEP2o (ORCPT ); Sat, 5 Jun 2010 11:28:44 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Len Brown Cc: Matthew Garrett , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Alan Stern On Fri, 2010-06-04 at 15:11 -0400, Len Brown wrote: > > Since the other patch 'ACPI / EC / PM: Fix race between EC transactions > > and system suspend' is now merged, this should be rebased on top of it > > (I did the opposite....) > > Maxim, > Since your system needs both these fixes, and they are merged together > in the acpi git tree, it would be great if you could test that tree > and let me know if we got it right. > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/lenb/linux-acpi-2.6.git test > > thanks, > Len Brown, Intel Open Source Technology Center > Which kernel do you expect these patches to land on? Best regards, Maxim Levitsky