From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: James Bottomley Subject: Re: 2.6.35-rc3 regression: IBM Maia system is unbootable [ACPI related?] Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2010 11:14:51 -0500 Message-ID: <1277136891.10998.67.camel@mulgrave.site> References: <1277136189.10998.63.camel@mulgrave.site> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from bedivere.hansenpartnership.com ([66.63.167.143]:59892 "EHLO bedivere.hansenpartnership.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932091Ab0FUQOx (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Jun 2010 12:14:53 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1277136189.10998.63.camel@mulgrave.site> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2010-06-21 at 11:03 -0500, James Bottomley wrote: > The system in question has a set of root bridges, with the CD rom (which > is seen) being on bus 0 and the SCSI controller, which doesn't show up > being on bus 1 (with several other things on busses > 1). > > The system uses ACPI to detect the multiple bridges, so it seems that > this failure in 2.6.35-rc3: > > ACPI: Core revision 20100428 > ACPI Error: Hardware did not enter ACPI mode (20100428/evxfevnt-103) > ACPI Warning: AcpiEnable failed (20100428/utxface-147) > ACPI: Unable to enable ACPI > > Means that we can't detect any PCI bus other than 0 and thus the system > won't boot. > > The full dmesgs for a successful (2.6.34) and failed (2.6.35-rc3) boot > are below. This didn't make either the PCI or the ACPI lists ... probably because of the attachments. However, the full message (with attachments) is on lkml: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127713622821166 James