public inbox for linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
To: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net>
Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] acpi: clear PCIEXP_WAKE_STS on resume
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 16:46:02 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1285688763.2072.6.camel@lenovo> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100928083121.f76e8991.rdunlap@xenotime.net>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1807 bytes --]

On Tue, 2010-09-28 at 08:31 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Sep 2010 12:00:24 +0100 Colin King wrote:
> 
> > From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
> > 
> > Section 4.7.3.1.1 (PM1 Status Registers) of version 4.0 of
> > the ACPI spec concerning PCIEXP_WAKE_STS points out in
> > in the final note field in table 4-11 that if this bit is
> > set to 1 and the system is put into a sleeping state then
> > the system will not automatically wake.
> > 
> > This bit gets set by hardware to indicate that the system
> > woke up due to a PCI Express wakeup event, so clear it during
> > acpi_hw_clear_acpi_status() calls to enable subsequent
> > resumes to work.
> > 
> > BugLink: http://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/613381
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/acpi/acpica/aclocal.h |    1 +
> >  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpica/aclocal.h b/drivers/acpi/acpica/aclocal.h
> > index 147a7e6..f26db38 100644
> > --- a/drivers/acpi/acpica/aclocal.h
> > +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpica/aclocal.h
> > @@ -853,6 +853,7 @@ struct acpi_bit_register_info {
> >  	ACPI_BITMASK_POWER_BUTTON_STATUS   | \
> >  	ACPI_BITMASK_SLEEP_BUTTON_STATUS   | \
> >  	ACPI_BITMASK_RT_CLOCK_STATUS       | \
> > +        ACPI_BITMASK_PCIEXP_WAKE_DISABLE   | \
> 
> (1) Above should be indented with tabs, not spaces.

My fail. Attached corrected patch.

> 
> (2) It should not take 2 emails to send a patch with one line changed.
> Patch 0/N is unnecessary and not desirable on short patch series (N = 1 is short).
> 
> >  	ACPI_BITMASK_WAKE_STATUS)
> >  
> >  #define ACPI_BITMASK_TIMER_ENABLE               0x0001
> > -- 
> 
> 
> ---
> ~Randy
> *** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***


[-- Attachment #2: 0001-acpi-clear-PCIEXP_WAKE_STS-on-resume.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 1369 bytes --]

>From 871dccf769ad7be6625bb10a0d58408bf90e6c51 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2010 15:14:43 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] acpi: clear PCIEXP_WAKE_STS on resume

Section 4.7.3.1.1 (PM1 Status Registers) of version 4.0 of
the ACPI spec concerning PCIEXP_WAKE_STS points out in
in the final note field in table 4-11 that if this bit is
set to 1 and the system is put into a sleeping state then
the system will not automatically wake.

This bit gets set by hardware to indicate that the system
woke up due to a PCI Express wakeup event, so clear it during
acpi_hw_clear_acpi_status() calls to enable subsequent
resumes to work.

BugLink: http://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/613381

Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
---
 drivers/acpi/acpica/aclocal.h |    1 +
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpica/aclocal.h b/drivers/acpi/acpica/aclocal.h
index 147a7e6..f26db38 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/acpica/aclocal.h
+++ b/drivers/acpi/acpica/aclocal.h
@@ -853,6 +853,7 @@ struct acpi_bit_register_info {
 	ACPI_BITMASK_POWER_BUTTON_STATUS   | \
 	ACPI_BITMASK_SLEEP_BUTTON_STATUS   | \
 	ACPI_BITMASK_RT_CLOCK_STATUS       | \
+	ACPI_BITMASK_PCIEXP_WAKE_DISABLE   | \
 	ACPI_BITMASK_WAKE_STATUS)
 
 #define ACPI_BITMASK_TIMER_ENABLE               0x0001
-- 
1.7.0.4


  reply	other threads:[~2010-09-28 15:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-09-28 11:00 [RESEND][PATCH 0/1] acpi: clear PCIEXP_WAKE_STS on resume Colin King
2010-09-28 11:00 ` [PATCH 1/1] " Colin King
2010-09-28 15:31   ` Randy Dunlap
2010-09-28 15:46     ` Colin Ian King [this message]
2010-09-28 15:51       ` Randy Dunlap
2010-09-28 19:42       ` Len Brown
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-08-04 10:06 [PATCH 0/1] " Colin King
2010-08-04 10:06 ` [PATCH 1/1] " Colin King

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1285688763.2072.6.camel@lenovo \
    --to=colin.king@canonical.com \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rdunlap@xenotime.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox