From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
To: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net>
Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] acpi: clear PCIEXP_WAKE_STS on resume
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 16:46:02 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1285688763.2072.6.camel@lenovo> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100928083121.f76e8991.rdunlap@xenotime.net>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1807 bytes --]
On Tue, 2010-09-28 at 08:31 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Sep 2010 12:00:24 +0100 Colin King wrote:
>
> > From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
> >
> > Section 4.7.3.1.1 (PM1 Status Registers) of version 4.0 of
> > the ACPI spec concerning PCIEXP_WAKE_STS points out in
> > in the final note field in table 4-11 that if this bit is
> > set to 1 and the system is put into a sleeping state then
> > the system will not automatically wake.
> >
> > This bit gets set by hardware to indicate that the system
> > woke up due to a PCI Express wakeup event, so clear it during
> > acpi_hw_clear_acpi_status() calls to enable subsequent
> > resumes to work.
> >
> > BugLink: http://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/613381
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/acpi/acpica/aclocal.h | 1 +
> > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpica/aclocal.h b/drivers/acpi/acpica/aclocal.h
> > index 147a7e6..f26db38 100644
> > --- a/drivers/acpi/acpica/aclocal.h
> > +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpica/aclocal.h
> > @@ -853,6 +853,7 @@ struct acpi_bit_register_info {
> > ACPI_BITMASK_POWER_BUTTON_STATUS | \
> > ACPI_BITMASK_SLEEP_BUTTON_STATUS | \
> > ACPI_BITMASK_RT_CLOCK_STATUS | \
> > + ACPI_BITMASK_PCIEXP_WAKE_DISABLE | \
>
> (1) Above should be indented with tabs, not spaces.
My fail. Attached corrected patch.
>
> (2) It should not take 2 emails to send a patch with one line changed.
> Patch 0/N is unnecessary and not desirable on short patch series (N = 1 is short).
>
> > ACPI_BITMASK_WAKE_STATUS)
> >
> > #define ACPI_BITMASK_TIMER_ENABLE 0x0001
> > --
>
>
> ---
> ~Randy
> *** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
[-- Attachment #2: 0001-acpi-clear-PCIEXP_WAKE_STS-on-resume.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 1369 bytes --]
>From 871dccf769ad7be6625bb10a0d58408bf90e6c51 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2010 15:14:43 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] acpi: clear PCIEXP_WAKE_STS on resume
Section 4.7.3.1.1 (PM1 Status Registers) of version 4.0 of
the ACPI spec concerning PCIEXP_WAKE_STS points out in
in the final note field in table 4-11 that if this bit is
set to 1 and the system is put into a sleeping state then
the system will not automatically wake.
This bit gets set by hardware to indicate that the system
woke up due to a PCI Express wakeup event, so clear it during
acpi_hw_clear_acpi_status() calls to enable subsequent
resumes to work.
BugLink: http://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/613381
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
---
drivers/acpi/acpica/aclocal.h | 1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpica/aclocal.h b/drivers/acpi/acpica/aclocal.h
index 147a7e6..f26db38 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/acpica/aclocal.h
+++ b/drivers/acpi/acpica/aclocal.h
@@ -853,6 +853,7 @@ struct acpi_bit_register_info {
ACPI_BITMASK_POWER_BUTTON_STATUS | \
ACPI_BITMASK_SLEEP_BUTTON_STATUS | \
ACPI_BITMASK_RT_CLOCK_STATUS | \
+ ACPI_BITMASK_PCIEXP_WAKE_DISABLE | \
ACPI_BITMASK_WAKE_STATUS)
#define ACPI_BITMASK_TIMER_ENABLE 0x0001
--
1.7.0.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-09-28 15:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-09-28 11:00 [RESEND][PATCH 0/1] acpi: clear PCIEXP_WAKE_STS on resume Colin King
2010-09-28 11:00 ` [PATCH 1/1] " Colin King
2010-09-28 15:31 ` Randy Dunlap
2010-09-28 15:46 ` Colin Ian King [this message]
2010-09-28 15:51 ` Randy Dunlap
2010-09-28 19:42 ` Len Brown
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-08-04 10:06 [PATCH 0/1] " Colin King
2010-08-04 10:06 ` [PATCH 1/1] " Colin King
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1285688763.2072.6.camel@lenovo \
--to=colin.king@canonical.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rdunlap@xenotime.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox