From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
To: "Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
Hans de Goede <hansg@kernel.org>,
platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org,
Kenneth Chan <kenneth.t.chan@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 0/5] platform/x86: panasonic-laptop: Bind to a platform device instead of an ACPI one
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2026 12:23:24 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <12863246.O9o76ZdvQC@rafael.j.wysocki> (raw)
Hi All,
This is an update of
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-acpi/5979471.DvuYhMxLoT@rafael.j.wysocki/
adding one patch and modifying the initial patch in v2 to retain the
current behavior when the registration of an ACPI notify handler for
OPTD fails.
This series is part of a larger effort to switch over all drivers using
the struct acpi_driver interface to the more common struct platform_driver
interface and eliminate the former. The background is explained in
Documentation/driver-api/acpi/acpi-drivers.rst and in the changelog of
the patch that introduced the above document:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/2396510.ElGaqSPkdT@rafael.j.wysocki/
The bottom line is that the kernel would be better off without struct
acpi_driver and so it is better to get rid of it.
This series carries out driver conversion of the platform x86 Panasonic
hotkey and LCD brightness control driver.
Patch [1/5] changes one function return type to void.
Patch [2/5] fixes the rollback path in acpi_pcc_hotkey_add() and rearranges
the driver removal code ordering to match it.
Patch [3/5] removes some redundant checks from the driver.
Patch [4/5] updates the driver to install an ACPI notify handler by itself
instead of using the .notify() callback from struct acpi_driver, which is
requisite for the driver conversion.
Patch [5/5] converts the driver to using struct platform_driver for device
binding.
Thanks!
next reply other threads:[~2026-03-19 11:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-19 11:23 Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2026-03-19 11:25 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] platform/x86: panasonic-laptop: Make pcc_register_optd_notifier() void Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-03-19 11:28 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] platform/x86: panasonic-laptop: Fix OPTD notifier registration and cleanup Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-03-19 11:29 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] platform/x86: panasonic-laptop: Remove redundant checks from 3 functions Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-03-19 11:30 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] platform/x86: panasonic-laptop: Register ACPI notify handler directly Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-03-19 11:33 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] platform/x86: panasonic-laptop: Convert ACPI driver to a platform one Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=12863246.O9o76ZdvQC@rafael.j.wysocki \
--to=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=hansg@kernel.org \
--cc=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kenneth.t.chan@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox