From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Huang Ying Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] ACPI, APEI patches for 2.6.37 Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 16:55:42 +0800 Message-ID: <1287737742.2862.241.camel@yhuang-dev> References: <1287538620-7442-1-git-send-email-ying.huang@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mga01.intel.com ([192.55.52.88]:49875 "EHLO mga01.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752005Ab0JVIzv (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Oct 2010 04:55:51 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Len Brown Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Andi Kleen , "linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" On Fri, 2010-10-22 at 13:50 +0800, Len Brown wrote: > On Wed, 20 Oct 2010, Huang Ying wrote: > > > [PATCH 2/9] Add lock-less version of bitmap_set/clear > > [PATCH 3/9] lock-less NULL terminated single list implementation > > [PATCH 4/9] lock-less general memory allocator > > What kinds of tests has this lockless lib code been subject to? These code are used by GHES only now. We have a test suite for GHES. These code works well for GHES. At the same time, we have test code dedicated for these lib too, including stress testing. > This is generic code, does it play on multiple architectures? We have tested the code on x86_64 and i386 architectures. For some other architectures, we have done compile testing. The code is quite simple, so I think it should run properly on other architectures too. Best Regards, Huang Ying