From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B6EFC3B1037; Tue, 12 May 2026 14:19:29 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1778595569; cv=none; b=mJzLY5p8H5Kjdvne6119M/35ztmRV/SIa5fYETBtRcbUpPtF4+wZkepK5J+5V4b05UwvOPhYeHKZPqr8YMfzkIUVSU3YlrYFZIXz9pm3ftuWjHrW9W7xiKsi2W2VbFoN4j8UPxkJIwa/XKm/L8puB8z4p8Mik7OZtaN9Nml3BwQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1778595569; c=relaxed/simple; bh=M00Vvi1LUzRwd8T6JtZ1syr05U3z/HiDIk8TB5gIWAE=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=GQpsNg3HQjpEY3jxiuGBvw0+wqz0nES0fzD/CTWwABvNoBYV2xdhc/kYbVxf9T/LmjFbCvMjdPkU8N3iCKOlhytYFY7RYsUc/tNCs78LXe5pg6xlAHGQWbIk0P5jXiGClcWngYFaGx2JYa8qvEv7mnPRDQ2QRK45bMx9wL6QvWU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=puY7xDYR; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="puY7xDYR" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AAD33C2BCB0; Tue, 12 May 2026 14:19:26 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1778595569; bh=M00Vvi1LUzRwd8T6JtZ1syr05U3z/HiDIk8TB5gIWAE=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:From; b=puY7xDYRZtimw9zSSqX+GEf18F7yXaG1Ctwt3iiWgJSvob8jGqNGr9JvGaHZs69fb J7aAOfWXheds+xesNQcf0hKWxe+8gdHBcPJGb4PxEQX1ygt7m3/oEOQBmMIwdy9UW2 AqIPZxKHN4mfWHwFDSh2bwXiIvqFfcQ0WqS3F70ay3gD06rbw5fSCiAW7Uu9w8y/y1 xp9LjAWuADKdssg2ZVSdJzEbbsYFIQ/djJil3RDxlFDieZqrTJyytw3MM1qZF4CkL3 RWbuanCEK1B8CuGyr/q8F7AOGuYUT0gRJuJWGT3fyQ0S9eMBt/eNAS/0YwmoUgLdTQ RMPW6PEMDLFvA== From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: Ilpo =?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=E4rvinen?= Cc: Hans de Goede , LKML , Linux ACPI , Corentin Chary , "Luke D. Jones" , Denis Benato , Pali =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Roh=E1r?= , Jonathan Woithe , Robert Gerlach , Matan Ziv-Av , Kenneth Chan , Mattia Dongili , Jeremy Soller , Azael Avalos , Andy Shevchenko , platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH v2 00/16] platform/x86: Check ACPI_COMPANION() against NULL during probe Date: Tue, 12 May 2026 16:01:43 +0200 Message-ID: <12904885.O9o76ZdvQC@rafael.j.wysocki> Organization: Linux Kernel Development Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Hi All, This series replaces https://lore.kernel.org/linux-acpi/5990022.DvuYhMxLoT@rafael.j.wysocki/ and, as a whole, it makes exactly the same code changes. Every platform driver can be forced to match a device that doesn't match its list of device IDs because of device_match_driver_override(), so platform drivers that rely on the existence of a device's ACPI companion object need to verify its presence. Accordingly, requisite ACPI_COMPANION() or ACPI_HANDLE() checks against NULL are added to multiple platform/x86 drivers that have been converted to platform drivers from ACPI drivers recently. Thanks!