* Re: [PATCHSET] workqueue: update workqueue users - replace create_workqueue()
2011-01-25 14:29 ` [PATCHSET] workqueue: update workqueue users - replace create_workqueue() Tejun Heo
@ 2011-01-25 16:26 ` Dave Jones
2011-01-26 10:40 ` Tejun Heo
2011-01-26 4:46 ` Greg KH
2011-02-01 10:44 ` Tejun Heo
2 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Dave Jones @ 2011-01-25 16:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tejun Heo; +Cc: linux-kernel, lenb, linux-acpi, cpufreq
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 03:29:21PM +0100, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> There was no response for the following patches and I'm planning on
> routing them through workqueue#for-2.6.39. If you have an objection
> or want to take the patch through a different tree, please let me
> know.
> ..
> 0007-cpufreq-use-system_wq-instead-of-dedicated-workqueue.patch
Feel free to add my
Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
to this.
I looked it over, and didn't see anything objectionable.
Dave
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCHSET] workqueue: update workqueue users - replace create_workqueue()
2011-01-25 16:26 ` Dave Jones
@ 2011-01-26 10:40 ` Tejun Heo
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Tejun Heo @ 2011-01-26 10:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dave Jones, linux-kernel, lenb, linux-acpi, cpufreq
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 11:26:54AM -0500, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 03:29:21PM +0100, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > There was no response for the following patches and I'm planning on
> > routing them through workqueue#for-2.6.39. If you have an objection
> > or want to take the patch through a different tree, please let me
> > know.
> > ..
> > 0007-cpufreq-use-system_wq-instead-of-dedicated-workqueue.patch
>
> Feel free to add my
> Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
> to this.
>
> I looked it over, and didn't see anything objectionable.
As the patch is going through wq tree, I added Acked-by instead of
Signed-off-by.
Thank you.
--
tejun
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCHSET] workqueue: update workqueue users - replace create_workqueue()
2011-01-25 14:29 ` [PATCHSET] workqueue: update workqueue users - replace create_workqueue() Tejun Heo
2011-01-25 16:26 ` Dave Jones
@ 2011-01-26 4:46 ` Greg KH
2011-02-01 10:44 ` Tejun Heo
2 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Greg KH @ 2011-01-26 4:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tejun Heo
Cc: linux-kernel, lenb, linux-acpi, davej, cpufreq, Markus.Lidel,
tomas.winkler, jayamohank, andrew.vasquez, James.Bottomley,
linux-scsi, tomof, stf_xl, linux-usb, tytso, mfasheh, joel.becker,
reiserfs-devel, aelder, hch, ericvh, rminnich, v9fs-developer,
lucho, andy.grover
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 03:29:21PM +0100, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> There was no response for the following patches and I'm planning on
> routing them through workqueue#for-2.6.39. If you have an objection
> or want to take the patch through a different tree, please let me
> know.
>
> 0019-usb-ueagle-atm-use-system_wq-instead-of-dedicated-wo.patch
I've already taken this in my usb-next tree to go into .39.
thanks,
greg k-h
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCHSET] workqueue: update workqueue users - replace create_workqueue()
2011-01-25 14:29 ` [PATCHSET] workqueue: update workqueue users - replace create_workqueue() Tejun Heo
2011-01-25 16:26 ` Dave Jones
2011-01-26 4:46 ` Greg KH
@ 2011-02-01 10:44 ` Tejun Heo
2 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Tejun Heo @ 2011-02-01 10:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
Cc: lenb, linux-acpi, davej, cpufreq, Markus.Lidel, tomas.winkler,
jayamohank, andrew.vasquez, James.Bottomley, linux-scsi, tomof,
stf_xl, linux-usb, tytso, mfasheh, joel.becker, reiserfs-devel,
aelder, hch, ericvh, rminnich, v9fs-developer, lucho, andy.grover
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 03:29:21PM +0100, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> There was no response for the following patches and I'm planning on
> routing them through workqueue#for-2.6.39. If you have an objection
> or want to take the patch through a different tree, please let me
> know.
>
> 0006-acpi-kacpi-_wq-don-t-need-WQ_MEM_RECLAIM.patch
> 0007-cpufreq-use-system_wq-instead-of-dedicated-workqueue.patch
> 0012-i2o-use-alloc_workqueue-instead-of-create_workqueue.patch
> 0013-misc-iwmc3200top-use-system_wq-instead-of-dedicated-.patch
> 0016-scsi-be2iscsi-qla2xxx-convert-to-alloc_workqueue.patch
> 0018-scsi-scsi_tgt_lib-scsi_tgtd-isn-t-used-in-memory-rec.patch
> 0019-usb-ueagle-atm-use-system_wq-instead-of-dedicated-wo.patch
> 0025-ext4-convert-to-alloc_workqueue.patch
> 0026-ocfs2-use-system_wq-instead-of-ocfs2_quota_wq.patch
> 0027-reiserfs-make-commit_wq-use-the-default-concurrency-.patch
> 0028-xfs-convert-to-alloc_workqueue.patch
> 0029-net-9p-use-system_wq-instead-of-p9_mux_wq.patch
> 0030-net-9p-replace-p9_poll_task-with-a-work.patch
> 0031-rds-ib-use-system_wq-instead-of-rds_ib_fmr_wq.patch
Patches applied to wq#for-2.6.39 w/ collected acks added.
Thank you.
--
tejun
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread